Submitted by davidlee93 t3_yuextf in news
pattydickens t1_iw9ahhb wrote
Countries should cut gas taxes completely for consumers and make up the difference by taxing oil company profits while enforcing price gouging regulations. Let the rich shoulder the burden for a change.
Zerotan t1_iw9oq72 wrote
It's a fine principle, but not effective. You can't tax "profits" because they will find ways to move money around so that they have "zero profit", paying shell companies for consulting services, etc.
Further, taxing a corporation for their income, or taxing the consumer purchasing the good they sell is effectively the same; both cause the corporation to raise their price by the same amount and both cause money to be taken out of the transaction and sent to the government.
RIP cap and trade... https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-officially-ends-cap-and-trade-1.4885872
Dmage22 t1_iwbyv1k wrote
Can we tax their revenue instead of profit ?
Alienteacher t1_iwdx79l wrote
It would result in the same thing as op just said. They would adjust prices to compensate to keep their profit margins similar. The only way to force their hand is to take a measure of control of the company itself. Force it to set a limit on price in relation to CPI, have windfall tax on profits that far exceed what they make, have quotas for refined oil they can process/sell
The govt would have to basically control the price and quantity. This is real Socialism. But outside of that there is no real way to force companies to pay their 'fair share' in a capitalist system
Dmage22 t1_iwdy6gr wrote
Even if they adjust price to maintain profits, taxing their revenue actually generate income for the government to spend on things. They can do shady tax avoidance to pay 0% tax if we only tax profit.
Alienteacher t1_iwe2vuk wrote
How can you establish an effective tax on revenue when business expenses vary so widely? And if a business increases it's expenses through nonsense like 'consulting fees' it will artificially increase their expenses
Legitimate-Cow-6859 t1_iw9dco8 wrote
Carbon tax and dividend
JokeassJason t1_iw9iuot wrote
And non of these bullshit carbon offsets. Paying a company not to DeForest the land they own is not a fucking offset.
[deleted] t1_iw9fh7f wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iwbuexa wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iwn2xng wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iw9hnvt wrote
[deleted]
pattydickens t1_iw9l45k wrote
No, because the ownership would still be private, they would just have to pay their fair share of taxes and make sacrifices like any other patriotic citizen has for the last 100 years while they got subsidies and free infrastructure.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments