Submitted by L_Cranston_Shadow t3_10p7jsw in news
BroHanzo t1_j6k1d73 wrote
Reply to comment by L_Cranston_Shadow in J&J’s Talc Bankruptcy Case Thrown Out by Appeals Court by L_Cranston_Shadow
So they know what they did? They know how they did it? They know who was involved and what “company” it’s now under….
Fuck these stupid assholes. Collectively. I’m sure individually someone has a red flag they’re waving, but collectively? If the company is to survive, are you gonna be the one to press the big red button?
Because we all know, all of it. I live and work with J&J people. It’s wild what they did - but they got away with it! Signaling to other companies, that if you sell a harmful product, then you’re fine as long as you launder the lawsuits through your subsidiaries!
This should be illegal, and why it’s not speaks to how fucked up our system is and how frustrating it is to be an American citizen, Watch this happen, and think to myself “well… I guess they always win huh.”
mrdilldozer t1_j6kuwin wrote
The product likely isn't harmful. You don't need to worry too much about it. A ton of follow-up studies have been done on it. The evidence of it causing cancer isn't great. Don't feel bad for them though, they've likely used their money to dodge lawsuits that actually deserved to lose in the past. If you want to be a multi-billion dollar company you better be willing to deal with the risks of the business.
mrdilldozer t1_j6lcp89 wrote
Uhh, you are aware of what the lawsuit was about right? It was about ovarian cancer. Did you read the article above? If this case were about breathing in small particles, the makers of Fun Dip would be fucked too. This case is about very specific medical claims. I don't feel sympathy for J&J, but I'm not going to pretend that a jury gets to have the final word on science. I can laugh at them for getting fucked over and read about the evidence at the same time. It's not a binary choice here.
damon459 t1_j6lerg2 wrote
I did you said there was no cancer risk, if it causes cancer in the lungs it’s not a huge leap to it’s carcinogenic and therefore causes cancer…
mrdilldozer t1_j6lj40t wrote
> if it causes cancer in the lungs it’s not a huge leap to it’s carcinogenic and therefore causes cancer…
It's a massive leap to say that. There is a ton of evidence about small particles getting trapped in the lungs leading to cellular damage. That causes the cells in the lungs to mutate into cancer. Ovaries don't function the same way your lungs do. It's why not using sunscreen puts you at risk for skin cancer and not pancreatic cancer. Different cancers have different causes.
damon459 t1_j6lmg5h wrote
Yeah and asbestos in you talc will cause cancer, get a clue.
mrdilldozer t1_j6ln9u2 wrote
A "wow, thanks for explaining basic things about cancer to me" would have been nice too. Take care, Dunning-Kruger.
[deleted] t1_j6m3hz9 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments