Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Outrageous-Stay6075 t1_j9kx1m9 wrote

Reply to comment by MoneyBags5200 in Texas homeowner faces fines after suspected DWI driver damages house by SarcasticGamer

...and that fine goes away as soon as the repairs are made. Did you read the whole article?

−22

MoneyBags5200 t1_j9kxm93 wrote

Yes that’s how I know what it said my guy. You as a person don’t seem to think it is unreasonable for a city to NOT fine a person for a separate person driving into their house. Tell me how this statement is false “Texas homeowner faces fines after suspected DWI driver damages house”. That’s what happened, yes the fines will go away but it’s the gall to do it in the first place. You couldn’t even put that into the title grammatically with how it was written. And if you don’t understand my point after this then well it doesn’t matter.

10

stewmander t1_j9lh86r wrote

Faces fines.

He wasn't fined.

It's click bate because it could just as easily been written "faces potential fines" or something.

"Hey, we're just letting you know that you're technically in violation, you have 30 days to fix it, but if you need more time just let us know."

Honestly the city seems the most reasonable of all involved here, but I get that an NOV letter might hurt the homeowners feelings.

−7

soolkyut t1_j9lbpfk wrote

You’re right, but it’s more fun for people to think the city is actually fining this guy.

They’re just flagging it in their system.

4