Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jdogx17 t1_j9rrroq wrote

Reply to comment by BuffaloInCahoots in Man charged after eating stolen chips dropped by thief, police say by jab116

No, the article says:

“Police said they reviewed video footage and concluded that Braswell was aware of the theft.”

Videos generally don’t show what people know or don’t know.

121

DogLegJournalist t1_j9tfqrg wrote

Yeah but pigs are trained to lie and judges give them the benefit of the doubt so... 6 months in jail it is.

35

BuffaloInCahoots t1_j9rs8lu wrote

So he probably saw it go down, like I said. That’s the only reasonable way to assume he knew they were stolen. Still don’t blame the dude, I would have grabbed a bag too.

20

Desdam0na t1_j9subev wrote

No. Police said according to a video they believe he knew.

They did not say he saw it happen, and the video is not available for us to confirm.

Police very consistently lie on these situations so we really don't know what happened unless they are willing to release the video

90

Kcidobor t1_j9tdya3 wrote

Police very consistently lie. In all situations

27

MakionGarvinus t1_j9u9awm wrote

I was trying to be fair to my neighbor, who is/was a cop. I've only spoken to him a few times in 8 years, but waved at him whenever we drove past each other. Seemed like a decent enough guy, still takes care of his grandkids full time.

This summer, I had noticed that his truck almost never left his driveway, and when it did, it was for short periods of time. I also knew that he was the most senior (longest tenure) officer in the force, so one day I asked him if he'd retired. Like, "hey, did you finally take a well-deserved retirement? Heh heh"

He responded with "maybe, not really, still working." I just remember thinking that it's been over 6 months since I saw him in uniform, what is he trying to hide from me? It's gotta be his instinctual lying, is all I can conclude.

2

DressForIt t1_j9ur5bj wrote

Lol what is this anecdote supposed to illustrate, you just spent 3 paragraphs explaining how you actually don't really know if your neighbor lies, but he's a cop who drives a truck and has grandkids, only he doesn't drive his truck much anymore.

5

MakionGarvinus t1_j9uu9p4 wrote

He's either been disciplined for 8 months to a year, or he flat lied to me that he didn't retire.

6

Kcidobor t1_j9usawe wrote

If you read between the lines it seems he’s saying that he is on disciplinary review. Maybe something using excessive force or abuse of powers. It’s mostly speculation but with the nature of the thread they commented on it would track

1

shaggybear89 t1_j9t0cv1 wrote

Alright dude. Whatever you want to believe. Yikes

−36

Zomburai t1_j9tdt1u wrote

I'm sorry, do you think police consistently tell the truth?

10

TheLostDovahkiin t1_j9t44ui wrote

If you saw someone walk out of a store with chips and they drop them. Your first conclusion is they are stolen ? 🤡

4

AdvonKoulthar t1_j9t4hbu wrote

I’m sure he just convinced the clerk to sell him the display, like most people do…

9

Kelpsie t1_j9t6lpq wrote

I'm not really looking to defend these asshole cops, but the thief literally took the chips display, crammed it into his car, and took off. I don't think ground-chips guy should have been arrested, but only an idiot would think anything other than 'robbery' in this situation.

4

Timmichanga1 t1_j9ty2ox wrote

Why are you assuming that a homeless man saw the thief take the display?

0

my_dogs_a_devil t1_j9uaca6 wrote

Because the police supposedly reviewed surveillance footage and came to the conclusion that the chip-eater knew they were stolen? Yes, you could assume the cops also came to that conclusion because they’re just racist dicks. You could assume a whole bunch of shit that takes the case either way. But from the details we have, I don’t think that the assumption that he witnessed the thief come out with the display is necessarily a bad one.

2

Timmichanga1 t1_j9uat2e wrote

If the last few years have taught us anything, it's that cops have not earned and do not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Do not blindly believe what they say - for fucks sake they even have a word for lying under oath during a trial, "testilying."

0

my_dogs_a_devil t1_j9utskz wrote

True but also which of these scenarios do you think is more plausible?
- The dude was in/around the store, saw everything go down, noticed the chips get dropped on the ground, and decided "hey, free chips", and picked them up to eat

- The dude was around the corner or somewhere where he saw/heard nothing go down, the cashier who chased the thief out didn't notice the chips that fell or didn't care to pick them up, and then the dude stumbled upon the scene and saw the chips, and then decided "hey, free chips", and picked them up to eat

2

Timmichanga1 t1_j9uu6wg wrote

I think it's most plausible that people on the Internet well removed from the situation shouldn't be speculating as to what happened.

But since we're speculating, I think the dude just wandered around the corner, saw chips on the ground, and ate chips. Angry piggies then pulled up and harassed him, and are now looking for a post hoc justification of their brutality.

−1

Kelpsie t1_j9ukrr4 wrote

Because the comment I responded to starts with "if you saw."

2

my_dogs_a_devil t1_j9uaizv wrote

If I saw someone camly walk out and accidentally drop a bag of chips? No. If I seen them running out carrying an entire display and drop a few bags while trying to jam it in their car and speed off…ya, probably??

0

jdogx17 t1_j9s26j7 wrote

Unless they were Salt & Vinegar. Anyone who eats those deserves a night in jail.

−32

CraftyArmitage t1_j9sl8om wrote

I respect your opinion while reserving the right to downvote you.

19