Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Yserbius t1_iv1kob2 wrote

Did you read the article? This isn't about education. This is about how the Al Sharpton supported anti-Semitic riot which killed three people in 1991 is being portrayed as a gang war between blacks and Hasidim.

The Times has had it out for Hasidim for far longer than the education controversy has been around. About five years ago, NYT made a big deal that they will start an effort to have their hiring practices reflect the diversity of New York City. When Jewish Twitter pointed out that this would mean they would have to hire 20-30 Hasidim and many more religious Jews, they simply stopped talking about it.

10

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv1ojpr wrote

Hasidim don’t meet the diversity criteria the times is interested in.

4

Obstinate_Turnip t1_iv55538 wrote

Isn't that simply a matter of the process by which racial categories were constructed by the government in the 1970's? David Bernstein has an extremely interesting book about this: Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America. South Asians and East Asians, who have little in common, were conflated as "Asian American." Jews specifically did not want to be in a category of their own: imagine the anti-Semitism that would result from accurate counts of Jews in academia, medicine, law, etc. Thus for purposes of government statistics, Jews are "white," along with other peoples with origins in the Middle East. If you're going to have diversity requirements for Hasidim, you would need to have such requirements for, say, the Welsh and Catalonians too.

2

creativepositioning t1_iv8pyar wrote

Bernstein is an insidious moron and a joke in the legal community and I promise you that has nothing to do with whatever he's saying about the Times. You probably didn't realize this, being a Bernstein fan, but it's clear the Times recognizes Jews as a racial category. The point was they don't recognize Hasidim.

1

thisismynewacct t1_iv1zd66 wrote

You’re right, it doesn’t, which is why it was weird for this articles author to bring it up.

2

Yserbius t1_iv26cja wrote

It's in the context of the general anti-religious Jew trend that the Grey Lady has had since forever. But your comment about how "just hasidim are irked by this" is flat out wrong. For one, Algemeiner is a secular Jewish paper that frequently publishes anti-Hasidic content itself.

2

prisoner_007 t1_iv2iyx9 wrote

Why is the article quoting from a heritage foundation sponsored opinion site?

2

LostSoulNothing t1_iv2pzo1 wrote

Because it's not a news article. It's an opinion piece by a right-wing pundit

2