Submitted by Unable-Ad3852 t3_zt70f7 in nyc
Texas_Rockets t1_j1dohpp wrote
This seems reasonable. They do an important and high level job. And the cost of living is going up considerably. If your argument in support of unions asking for raises is rooted in rising living costs I’m not sure why that wouldn’t apply here as well.
I’d really like the see staff comp go up though. The pay for jobs like this are ass, to the point that the only people that do it are young rich kids.
jgalt5042 t1_j1dujt7 wrote
No. I’m sorry but “public servants” shouldn’t be supporting anti market principles such as unions or any other regulatory barrier. Neither should they be inflating the cost of government. Lay them all off.
Texas_Rockets t1_j1dycf4 wrote
Well if you’re against unions at least you’re being consistent.
They are public servants but they’re also people doing a demanding job whose counterparts in the private sector are making 10x what they do as executives. They need to be willing to make a sacrifice but it’s also not fair to place this level of responsibility on someone and then put them in a financial situation where they need a roommate if they want to live in an ok area.
And this is especially true if they’re being prevented from earning more than 35k outside of government, given that many presumably have established careers.
jgalt5042 t1_j1e5x6b wrote
Correct. Unions are unacceptable and have no place in a capitalist society.
Public sector? Demanding? That’s an oxymoron. There is little to no work done in the public sector. Their contribution to society is negative. Their “peers” aren’t making anything as their contribution is not comparable.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments