Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Badroadrash101 t1_iycuil6 wrote

Get ready to see mom and grandma getting sued as they are the legal owners of the vehicle that was underinsured. They allowed an unlicensed driver to operate the vehicle, which invalidated the coverage of the insurance which is probably why the insurance company won’t provide coverage.

2

27Believe t1_iyd1m64 wrote

Where do you see that he didn’t have a license ?

1

MyFreeAccount OP t1_iyd6l1i wrote

Indeed, he was licensed, just not specifically named on the insurance any longer.

1

27Believe t1_iyd8qwf wrote

So what is the reason they are giving that they (insurance co) won’t take care of it ? Do they not believe he relocated and was truly out of the house ?

1

MyFreeAccount OP t1_iydflfo wrote

They are saying that since he was removed, he was not covered.

1

mom2angelsx3 t1_iydn5nm wrote

He was removed because he moved but then moved back in & should have been re-added to the policy which would have increased the costs so, it was not done?

3

27Believe t1_iydvbd0 wrote

Where does it say he moved back in ? It says he was visiting.

1

MikeWPhilly t1_iydyg8a wrote

Did he have a residence else where? From your posts on my other comments he did not. You also said he was in CA at his parents for over his month. He was living there and you are probably screwed because of that to be honest. Unless you can show he had a residence with mail else where?

1

mom2angelsx3 t1_iyeb35y wrote

Visiting for more than a month & may be staying indefinitely, if he has a lease or permanent address elsewhere established they may have a leg to stand on but otherwise, owner of vehicle on the hook for damages.

1

27Believe t1_iyej2pv wrote

Yeah she didn’t say that til way later on!

1

27Believe t1_iyej5vd wrote

I didn’t see that til now. A month is back.

1