GroundControl_1 t1_j6f01xj wrote
Reply to comment by muffinhead2580 in the last photo of John F. Kennedy (the 35th president of the USA), in a few seconds he will be gone. by MedicalJoseph
Again, you're using an ad-hom and providing no data. Calling someone "a joke" isn't an argument and doesn't support your claims, rather, it tends to indicate that you are not debating from facts. Can you make your case without diminishing the humanity of the people you are debating? It doesn't seem like you can, and that's a problem.
2: there is ample data provided by both RFK and Carlson, but you refuse to review or acknowledge it because "those people." Isn't that classical, textbook wilfull ignorance? How does that differ from the behavior we see e.g. in "To Kill a Mockingbird?"
It doesn't 🤷♂️
you're refusing to review information because you hate people.
That's it.
engelbert_humptyback t1_j6g6jjl wrote
Guys stop ad homming me 😢
[deleted] t1_j6gid4b wrote
[removed]
NlXON t1_j6hx57r wrote
I have friends on both sides of the American aisle and I am not targeting you or any base in this comment. This is purely objective.
I watched the video you were referring to. Tucker Carlson is creating a narrative, just as every American news/infotainment company does. The sources being used are unconfirmed and did not confirm that there was involvement, the expressed belief that there was involvement. Two different things.
He is right that conspiracy theory has a certain perceived connotation, mostly because it is a term used to categorize events that are orchestrated by secret but influential organizations. This same term is used for categorizing the Illuminati, alien abductions, ufo sightings and many more events and phenomena that have been claimed, but not confirmed.
The whole segment was wrapped with character descriptives aimed at supporting a narrative and lacked basic support for the claims. This is why Fox News and more specifically Tucker Carlson, and similarly Rachel Maddow on the other side of the spectrum, is negatively perceived outside of the GOP, because there is a narrative being driven to increase viewership for the network.
[deleted] t1_j6lehdl wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments