Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AllTheRoadRunning t1_j6fi35s wrote

It depends on the resources, though. If you can ensure that kids have 1. a regular breakfast, 2. a regular lunch, and 3. face time with positive role models you'll see improvements. All three of those things cost money.

10

jracka t1_j6g5zug wrote

Two parent households also help with all three of those according to data. No idea how we encourage that though, but I know I never see it talked about.

8

SwanOverSunshine t1_j6gixoh wrote

Or maybe just don’t have kids if you can’t provide those things?

1

FlexRVA21984 t1_j6gnrv4 wrote

Agree 100% w/ this. Bringing people into the world when you don’t have the means to provide for them is criminal

4

STREAMOFCONSCIOUSN3S t1_j6frmy0 wrote

Would the positive role models be hired from outside the community, is that the idea?

0

AllTheRoadRunning t1_j6ftgq9 wrote

Not necessarily. Ask people in the area for suggestions--after all, they'll know better than anyone else. After-school and weekend activities provide another opportunity for F2F interactions between kids and role models as well.

2

eclectic-and-effete t1_j6ggjbd wrote

^^^ big ditto to your comment. There isn’t enough emphasis on lived expertise. Far too often the “experts” (lol) come in and make decisions FOR communities rather than with communities.

1

fractalflatulence t1_j6hudt1 wrote

Is “FaceTime with positive role models” code for having a responsible father around?

Why are people afraid to talk about the destruction of the nuclear family in black communities?

−2

AllTheRoadRunning t1_j6hzxrr wrote

I meant exactly what I said and said exactly what I meant. Also--to be clear--I'm talking about face time as in face-to-face interactions, not iPhone video calls.

−1