ohgoshyes t1_j7usxtp wrote
Furthermore proving that we are unable to replicate the sun.
ryanjovian t1_j7wj5rj wrote
The indoor growing process does exactly that to increase potency and density. So in this specific case we have not only replicated but improved upon the sun.
ohgoshyes t1_j7wldwl wrote
you’re joking ? do u know how bright the sun is? you should go check out Bruce Bugbee and his research on cannabis. i thought i knew something. no lights are even close to the sun nor the wave lengths nor spectrum. check out his grow light myths video it will change your perspective
adaminc t1_j7wu65i wrote
1361W/m^2 at Earths surface is how bright it is, we can easily simulate and supersede that.
zero0n3 t1_j7y4y29 wrote
CMH bulbs were designed by the military for subs and replicate the wavelengths used by the sun.
Here’s some old but accurate info: https://migrolight.com/blogs/grow-light-news/grow-light-spectrum-explained
[deleted] t1_j7woby3 wrote
[removed]
Hajac t1_j7xynax wrote
You can't spell knew. You post so confidently.
[deleted] t1_j7wlpna wrote
[removed]
jimboni t1_j7wv2vq wrote
Outdoor grow weed is WAY better than indoor. If you can keep it unpollinated anyway.
FartyPants69 t1_j7xsuip wrote
The design of this study doesn't demonstrate that at all. Because they didn't control variables like soil composition and nutrients, the light source might have absolutely nothing to do with it. These results could be 100% driven by nutrient availability, or any of the other variables they didn't control.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments