Already is.

Airport and casinos can map out your entire path thru their property. They likely can isolate it too and “blur out” everyone else for evidence purpose.

If you want to know what a true dystopian system could look like? Look no further than casinos and China. I’d actually guess that US casinos are more advanced than China in some regards, but that’s because casinos are as close to the cutting edge US spy tech you’ll ever see without working for those agencies.

Just remember - sometimes these apps hate upgrading their UI. So it may look like a 1990s cctv system, but behind it is a cluster of 4090s or aws nodes doing the heavy lifting.

Yep. And that’s a job for AI in big systems (say at a Walmart or federal building)

Yeah. Because that’s what they are doing here. Their goal is to enact their moral and social rules on everyone.

Vs ya know making their tool reasonably safe to use.

Not saying there isn’t a problem, just that your and this subs mindset has been less “how we fix this” and more “oh my god see openAI hates white people and men”

Though I applaud you for having a source, the context and nuance of these reports is lacking without going through them.

Are they tagging a black man assaulting another black man as a hate crime?

How many hate crimes from white people go unreported ? White cop covers up for white suspect.

Etc.

How many hate crime charges filed vs dropped and what were the race breakdowns.

All I’m trying to drive at is that this stat may not be the best to use to get a true representation.

Doesn’t pass the eye test. How many instances of a black cop shooting a white guy in the back running away vs a white coo shooting a black guy in the back?

Or how many black people are shooting up a group of white people because of their whiteness vs a white guy running through a crowd because they were at a BLM protest?

You are arguing in bad faith.

FL is banning books and classes based on what they teach. We are already doing the very thing you say we shouldn’t be doing.

The difference here is FL is banning books that talk about the bad things Americans did in history or about scientific things they don’t agree with. Where as openAI is suppressing hate speech and disinformation like “the Holocaust isn’t real”.

It’s extremely obvious the differences here… and as such you are continuing to argue in bad faith.

Block it is.

I have no opinion because it’s irrelevant in this discussion if you actually understood nuance and context.

The first amendment doesn’t protect you or me when we say hateful things towards another person or group of people. It protects our freedom of speech when saying negative things about our government.

Jesus fuck.

I read the study you use as a reference and it was a really decently well done study.

Passes the eye test for sure, but never can just rely on that.

Absolutely false.

People are not “evenly divided” these days.

Polls both domestic and international prove the opposite, unless you want to include say NK and China (and even then China may be authoritarian, but have plenty of social programs)

This isn’t “making fun of” this is targeting “hate speech”

I’d love to know what “hate speech” towards rich people looks like.

Disagreement with a republican isn’t hate speech, no matter what they try and say. Calling a black person thr hard R is absolutely hate speech.

I think this is where they were trying to go but could t really connect the dots fully.

Like hatful speech of rich people vs black people. It’s clear why one is ok and the other isn’t (one is hate toward a group based on attributes they can’t change. The other isn’t generic attribute based )

Unrelated: my new thing to fight white supremacy is:

“Hey; 20 years ago your racist white ass was saying the ‘blacks’ need to fix their own race and that’s how you fix racism. How about you take your own advice and fix your own white asses”

Yeah nuance and context mean nothing.

It’s why you’ll be destined to stay an idiot.

If you do this right you can have a lawyer or agent or LLC claim it so you have a layer of protection

I wasn’t the one saying art was scarce. I’m the one saying it was abundant! It’s the medium we record it on that has changed over time. The concept of art really hasn’t.

And even then it wasn’t scarce. Just look at the pyramids. Art everywhere from the writing to the presentation of mummies etc.

The emotion and free will piece was more conceptual. Like A species that doesn’t have emotions or free will wouldn’t be able to create or understand art at any level.

Don’t argue with me argue with the dictionary.

Art is a fucking concept. Literally impossible without other concepts like “emotion” and “free will”.

Art isn’t just the painting storing a snapshot. It’s the moment itself. Experiencing it.

What don’t you get?

“Art” was always being created - we just don’t have a record of it. It was never scarce in the moment. It’s all around you.

What’s scarce is the medium people use to RECORD art.

It’s like my point keeps going right over your head.

No it doesn’t. You don’t get it.

Art was never scarce. Anyone and everyone makes art. Your 7 yr old telling you about his dream - art.

Art boils down to creative expression. The medium is what made it scarce in the past. No paper for that kid to draw on. No pen for the person wanting to write a story.

The only difference is there is now a medium that allows near instant transmission of that expression.

Definition btw:

> the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination.

Hell, the person who designed your house created art.

Art was never scarce. You’re just looking at specific mediums.

Mediums used to be scarce. Or I should say the mediums that can be stored and cataloged used to be scarce.

I wonder if this is a materials process (coating the wood then injecting the co2 or something like that) or genetic modification to have it absorb more co2?

Because genetically modified trees that:

• absorb more co2
• use less nutrients & water / co2 captured
• grows and works faster
• produces wood that is an order of magnitude better than current wood

Is probably like some golden chalice in green carbon capture

CMH bulbs were designed by the military for subs and replicate the wavelengths used by the sun.

Here’s some old but accurate info: https://migrolight.com/blogs/grow-light-news/grow-light-spectrum-explained

Except you then don’t know if it was actually outdoors that led to this or say the nutrient mix lacking some ingredient in the indoor mix.

It’s useless data.

Also what light did they use indoors as a test? HPS? CMH? MH? some LED hood?

Look. The way I see it - if they had something as good as chstGPT, they would have already found a way to monetize it or beta it publicly.

They don’t and wont catch up because google VS MS isn’t a fair fight.

Google is like ALL ad revenue based. AI like this is what will DESTROY their business model overnight.

MS, on the other hand, has office365 / Azure / etc.

Their AI is going to actually be useful and it’s adoption rate is going to be astronomically fast once the benefits are seen.

Google has no chance unless they are willing to lose half their ad revenue to compete properly.

Their revenue stream isn’t based on ads.

MS will win simply because as we get AI assistants - ad viewing will go down. How does google show me an ad if I’m not going to google and instead asking the same question to clippy and getting a legit, good answer back?

The key is asking good questions. Include things like “include a list of sources where your data came from and can be verified” or things like that.

This is a terrible idea and just greedy.