Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

QristopherQuixote t1_j9y76yl wrote

The risk of an accident skyrockets for drivers over 80, with only teenagers looking worse. We need better screening for anyone over 70. We also need better public transport for the elderly.

21

Manofalltrade t1_j9yhr7z wrote

Go for it. It seems like drivers in late life decline get a pass unless their family steps in. While it might be irritating when it happens, sound minded me would rather have future me be stopped by a system before hurting anyone. Self driving cars might actually work by then anyway so it wouldn’t even be an issue.

10

Wassux t1_ja03amd wrote

That's what you think now. But old you won't give a damn about anyone else because you'll be dead soon anyway.

Add to that, that is some countries a car is the only way to reliably get around when you're old and I bet you'd think differently when you're older.

3

Ixneigh t1_j9y5p0i wrote

Great let’s make one for politicians

6

Wagamaga OP t1_j9y2ikr wrote

Using ensemble learning techniques and longitudinal data from a large naturalistic driving study, researchers at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, and Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons have developed a novel, interpretable and highly accurate algorithm for predicting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older drivers. Digital markers refer to variables generated from data captured through recording devices in the real-world setting. These data could be processed to measure driving behavior, performance and tempo-spatial pattern in exceptional detail. The study is published in the journal Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

The researchers used an interaction-based classification method for selecting predictive variables in the dataset. This learning model has achieved an accuracy of 96 percent in predicting mild cognitive impairment and dementia, outperforming traditional machine learning models such as logistic regression and random forests -- a statistical technique widely used in AI for classifying disease status. “Our new ensemble learning model based on digital markers and basic demographic characteristics can predict mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older drivers with excellent accuracy,” said Sharon Di, associate professor of civil engineering and engineering mechanics at Columbia Engineering and the study’s lead author.

The investigators constructed 200 variable modules using the naturalistic driving data on the driver, the vehicle and the environment captured by in-vehicle recording devices for 2977 drivers participating in the Longitudinal Research on Aging Drivers (LongROAD) project, a prospective cohort study conducted in five sites across the contiguous United States and sponsored by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. At the time of enrollment, the participants were active drivers aged 65-79 years who were cognitively intact. Data used in this study came from the first three years of follow-up, spanning from August 2015 through March 2019. During the follow-up, 36 participants were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, 8 with Alzheimer’s disease, and 17 with other or unspecified dementia.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365723000246#b7

2

bannedPosts t1_ja0dswa wrote

What's the false positive/negative rate. How's it work on 30-year olds? Mostly I see asshole drivers a lot younger than I am.

2

AutoModerator t1_j9y2fq2 wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

noopenusernames t1_ja23yk1 wrote

Great. Now let’s implement it into biannual license tests for people over a certain age

1

bannedPosts t1_ja49uy6 wrote

Few if any humans have had their "cognitive impairment" continuously documented over 60 or 75 years. What orifice did the "researchers" pull this metric from? Smells like and agenda to me. 96% accuracy? What's the standard measure, is it reproduceable, peer-reviewed? False positive rate? False negatives? Are these "researchers" professional driving evaluators? psychologists, statisticians, code monkeys?

1

Yodayorio t1_ja91lxu wrote

We need mandatory annual screening for drivers over 70, and semi-annual (every 6 months) screenings for drivers over 80.

1