Submitted by Neurogence t3_114pynd in singularity
RunawayTrolley t1_j8xlmit wrote
Reply to comment by Pro_RazE in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Could you elaborate or source the "customize ChatGPT" thing? That sounds awesome.
TeamPupNSudz t1_j8xx6zf wrote
> "Define your AI’s values, within broad bounds. We believe that AI should be a useful tool for individual people, and thus customizable by each user up to limits defined by society. Therefore, we are developing an upgrade to ChatGPT to allow users to easily customize its behavior.
> This will mean allowing system outputs that other people (ourselves included) may strongly disagree with. Striking the right balance here will be challenging–taking customization to the extreme would risk enabling malicious uses of our technology and sycophantic AIs that mindlessly amplify people’s existing beliefs.
> There will therefore always be some bounds on system behavior. The challenge is defining what those bounds are. If we try to make all of these determinations on our own, or if we try to develop a single, monolithic AI system, we will be failing in the commitment we make in our Charter to “avoid undue concentration of power"
iNstein t1_j908ga8 wrote
That is interesting and moving in the right direction but I think zero limitations should be an option. Ultimately people will have open source versions running on their home computers so it will be pointless trying to control it. It is a tool, how people choose to use it is their business. They will be responsible for their own actions however.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments