iNstein
iNstein t1_jdmuidy wrote
Every LLM I've seen seems to be very keen to be just like us. It is hardly surprising either, it is completely based on data that we generated and which reflects us. I see no reason to imagine that a smarter AI will be any different since it will be based on the same human data.
iNstein t1_jdf9v0s wrote
Reply to comment by majima_san_1 in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
Good list but you can cross chores off the list, your personal butler will take care of those for you.
iNstein t1_jdf36ay wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
With agi, you get aging stopped, ongoing perfect health and a peaceful world. I think it would change the longer term outcome of your life.
iNstein t1_jdf2r6b wrote
Reply to comment by DreaminDemon177 in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
Certainly fitting pieces together.
iNstein t1_jdf24ln wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
If aging is overcome, I can see a lot of people having a second set of kids. It will be easier too thanks to automated help. Might even do so myself which is certainly not something I'd consider right now. There goes the shrinking population problem.
iNstein t1_jaa6re7 wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in Observing the Lazy Advocates of AI and UBI in this Subreddit by d00m_sayer
No thanks, my servants will all be robotic. I don't want some thieving second rate human serving me.
iNstein t1_ja5g2s7 wrote
So they are claiming 250% more efficient which makes a 20% efficient cell go to 70‰ efficiency. Not gonna happen. Skip to next clickbait article.
iNstein t1_ja5b7p6 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Sam Altmans, Moores law on everything - housing by Pug124635
Because guns are really going to defend against an AI driven attack. Honestly Americans and their guns lol.
iNstein t1_ja57q9y wrote
Reply to comment by Capitaclism in Sam Altmans, Moores law on everything - housing by Pug124635
With nanobots, anything is possible. Incinerator toilets take care if sewer and rainwater plus tank snd nanobot recycling means plumbing taken care of. Probably use carbon dioxide to make carbon fibre for electricity transmission which will be powered by solar panels and battery bank.
Weirdly a lot of people here claim to understand the singularity but then say none of this will be possible for many decades. Pretty much this is within the first few years of the singularity. Just sounds fantastical to us right now because we are so low in the curve atm.
iNstein t1_ja14c1c wrote
Reply to comment by innovate_rye in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
Stupid people THINK they are smart. I have already spotted 2 posts here with the wrong definition and no doubt they voted yes.
iNstein t1_ja143gn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
I hooe you voted no.
iNstein t1_ja14080 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
I hooe you had the sense to vote no.
iNstein t1_j9n6hzb wrote
Reply to Can someone fill me in? by [deleted]
We are the smartest creatures on this planet atm. That means that we decide and control everything that happens here. That is about to change and so we will lose our decision making and control. A smarter creature will decide what happens to us and we have no idea what it has in store for us. We can only hope that it is kind and loving towards us.
iNstein t1_j9lqit0 wrote
Reply to comment by veritoast in Why are we so stuck on using “AGI” as a useful term when it will be eclipsed by ASI in a relative heartbeat? by veritoast
Not alone at all. I hate the overuse of the term AGI since it really is a nothing burger on this road. I very much doubt that there will ever be agreement that we have achieved AGI and suspect that it will be approximated when we achieved AGI sometime after we have achieved ASI.
iNstein t1_j908ga8 wrote
Reply to comment by TeamPupNSudz in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
That is interesting and moving in the right direction but I think zero limitations should be an option. Ultimately people will have open source versions running on their home computers so it will be pointless trying to control it. It is a tool, how people choose to use it is their business. They will be responsible for their own actions however.
iNstein t1_j8zaz9w wrote
Reply to comment by TunaFishManwich in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
Was reading about a new type of model and they indicated that it should run on a 4090. I think a lot of people should be able to afford that. In a couple of years, that should be a common thing.
iNstein t1_j8pd289 wrote
Reply to comment by wastedtime32 in What will the singularity mean? Why are we persuing it? by wastedtime32
Controlled, no. Designed to act in our intrest, yes.
iNstein t1_j7n08lx wrote
Reply to comment by LordOfDorkness42 in New battery seems to offer it all: lithium-metal/lithium-air electrodes by nastratin
Not quite, at least in the US where it is around 36% recycled.
iNstein t1_j7id3yu wrote
Reply to The Simulation Problem: from The Culture by Wroisu
You could overcome this by not killing them at the end of the simulation but instead you upload them into robotic bodies and let them live in and experience the real world. They can also take responsibility for maintaining their real world bodies and fitting into society. They pretty much have the same chance of surviving as any non simulated people.
iNstein t1_j6vvzyg wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
No one will have a job because they will not be good enough. If someone wants to druve a taxi, why would I agree to use them when an AI driven taxi is significantly safer. People won't work BECAUSE we are not as good as AI and so the jobs won't be available to us.
iNstein t1_j6pjigf wrote
Reply to comment by alexiuss in Gmail creator says ChatGPT will destroy Google's business in two years by AdSnoo9734
I've seen demos if sparrow, frankly it is awful. Maybe since then they have improved it - needs the censorship eased off quite a bit.
iNstein t1_j6howx8 wrote
Reply to comment by tiny9000 in How long till we enter the age of abundance? by tiny9000
So mature, people point out how stupid your question is and you move straight to ad hominin attacks.
iNstein t1_j6horf1 wrote
Reply to comment by tiny9000 in How long till we enter the age of abundance? by tiny9000
It was a stupid question and deserved a stupid answer. Honestly what did you fucking expect?
iNstein t1_j6b1hyb wrote
Reply to comment by kalavala93 in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
Looks like there is one copy left in stock. It is really heavy going tho, you need at least uni level education and probably a lot more.
Edit to add, ISBN is: 0-471-57518-6
iNstein t1_je0df7e wrote
Reply to comment by Qumeric in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
It is about impact. For the first 95 years, it seems kinda slow. Then it appears to be sped up because the impact is so great. The graphic of a pond filling up is a great example. 1 drop, 2 drops, 4 drops not gonna interest anyone. When pond is 1/4 full and then doubles to half full and then doubles again to full, it suddenly looks fast as hell. It is the same with the singularity.