An AI recently piloted a Lockheed Martin aircraft for over 17 hours during a testing period in December.
Submitted by Dalembert t3_1126yll in singularity
So if an AI is piloting it does that make it a drone?
That's actually a really good question. What do you think? Maybe drone will be replacing every other word like "helicopter", "fighter jet". They'll just all be a different kinds of drones.
Actually, I guess Im dumb because the drone part is describing the remote human. Cut out the remote human and its something else.
>Im dumb because the drone part is describing the remote human.
Not at all, we'd just call it an autonomous drone until we come up with a shorter catchier name as they become more common.
Autos?
You misspelled 'Killbots'.
Hello skynet my old friend
No one say fire.
Hollywood: (creates terminator series to warn humans)
Humans: "that's fear mongering"
Also humans: proceeds to create ai attack helicopter drones
This was my first thought. Including a cockpit and systems to keep a human comfortable and alive and safe are honestly a waste of space. If anything it should be a drone with ground control options as a backup in the event of a problem. That would be safer than having a pilot there in case of a problem anyway.
You can't always have guaranteed communication with any aircraft, bandwidth limitations, weather, jamming, and just signal strength limitations.
One of the issues with some strikes historically has been the limited data sent back fir decision making.
Result- a lot of collateral damage, as people in the ground make quick decisions with grainy videos and limited supporting data, which leads to lots of collateral and civilian deaths.
Optionally-piloted vehicle
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments