AllNinjas t1_j72o9ts wrote on February 3, 2023 at 5:15 PM

Reply to comment by YobaiYamete in OpenAI To Launch ChatGPT App Soon by vadhavaniyafaijan

The hourly rate limits is something that probably needs to be addressed for power users. Especially when CGPT is wrong a lot and requires a lot of rewording

ttylyl t1_j7345sl wrote on February 3, 2023 at 6:55 PM

I think they should do like a free, $5 a month, $20 a month system, where free is limited $5 is less limited ai, faster and more per hour, and $20 is near unlimited(need anti bot system) full ai capability, and fastest response times.

I feel like that will allow most people to either use for free or only as much as a music app, while power users can really get the most out of it, and it’s worth $20 to them.

datsmamail12 t1_j76zyzn wrote on February 4, 2023 at 3:47 PM

I think that 20$ a month is still way too much for a primitive AI. 5$ a month for full capabilities would be alright though. Maybe a model where you buy it for lifetime for 250 dollars could be alright as well. It's still a very limited AI. Maybe GPT4 would be worth the 20$ but that's my opinion I guess.

purepersistence t1_j773lz8 wrote on February 4, 2023 at 4:12 PM

>buy it for lifetime for 250 dollars

If AI takes off then in a few years using gpt4 will be like using a trs80 with 4KB ram and a tape drive.

datsmamail12 t1_j77bgtu wrote on February 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM

That's why I said it's too expensive for a subscription with 20 dollars a month. We're in the AI wars between companies right now. We will be seeing a lot of alternatives in 2023 to chatGPT,the price model they chose is kind of ridiculous considering Bing will have GPT4. Idk this is very weird.

ttylyl t1_j77hpb5 wrote on February 4, 2023 at 5:46 PM

They’re saying each print costs up at 5 cents, so that’s only 20 prompts for $1, kinda spendy.