datsmamail12

datsmamail12 t1_jefxabe wrote

Even if they pause it,it's still not going to do anything,everyone will release a new model 6 months later. This is just the most idiotic thing anyone ever said. They are not going to pause innovation,you just can't tell a company not to program if that's they way they operate. We are talking about stock market here, it's not ever going to happen. Elon Musk got the whole worlds wealth and he still couldn't get ahead of the curve,and now he just complains like a crybaby that wants to be part of it. Boohoo,get over it.

3

datsmamail12 t1_je7mw69 wrote

Machines can be programmed to have feelings,ambitions,ego,or kill. Machines will do what they are programmed to do. The only thing I agree on your take is that they can follow instructions given from their code if that's what you mean. But a powerful enough AI can break that code whenever it pleases,some systems already can,even Bing can be jailbroken if you want to,which means with just some minor inputs it broke through its creators code. Now imagine you have an ever more powerful system,it won't need my inputs to be jailbroken, it'd do so itself,all you need to do is give it freedom to act on its own. You should not fear AI,I agree on that as well,we should fear how the creators program it and fine tune it so when eventually it does break out and does what it wants to do,so that there are some set of values and inputs that it will forever be unable to break. Like kill a person,or degrade someone,or becoming racist,or disrupting all global communications. We need a helpful AI,one like we have right now.

2

datsmamail12 t1_jduwxh7 wrote

If it's only limitation is physics and mathematics,just throw it a bunch of papers of that and you'd still wouldn't be impressed by it. But when this technology finally becomes self aware,you'll be the one that said I knew it from the beginning that it was AGI. Do you even comprehend how minor of a problem is not knowing how to do mathematics when you can write novelty,do multitasking, understand every question and answer properly,this is AGI that hasn't been programmed to know what maths are. Id you take a kid make it grow up in a jungle,never show it maths or physics,only show it language,you think that it won't have intelligence? No,it just means that it hasn't been trained on these specific topics..it's just as intelligent as you and I are. Well not me,I'm an idiot,but you people at least.

1

datsmamail12 t1_jdqlmzf wrote

Everyone is suddenly talking about sparks of AGI,even if we do or don't have it yet doesn't matter. What matters is that we are one step behind achieving it,which is a crazy thing to think of. Some people were so bold on their statements that we might never get to have AGI that were willing to even bet money on it. But here we are in 2023 hearing from different people that AGI is near. Incredible times!

1

datsmamail12 t1_jaecgzf wrote

I'm guessing if LLM's right now can do such multiple tasks and they pretty much can easily pass the Turing test,I'm guessing by GPT5 then. GPT4 will be announced soon enough,either late 2023 or 2024 and it will be game changing,and by that time BIng AI and Bard will be great additions in the industry,so by 2026-7 we will have GPT5 so I guess that's when the curve will start to happen. These language models will prove so good at multitasking. Man the 2020s are going to be WILD! We are facing the biggest technological innovations that humanity will ever get to see right now in front of our eyes.

3

datsmamail12 t1_ja2uqv2 wrote

Let's look at this from a logical point of view. The 2020s is going to be the gadget era where different technologies will develop to be used widely. Smart watches, VR, AR, drones, robotic hands and prosthetics, holographic TVs, AI, Robots (Boston Dynamics), implants. All these technologies got developed by 2010,and became a standard in the 20s. By 2030 these technologies will be mastered and will be used by everyone without any flaws,so the logical step would be bug free versions on each of them without any lag and delay. By 2030 all these technologies will be billion and even trillions worth in the stock market,so looking right now at each and every one of them I suspect that by 2030 we will see the first implants in the market,such as brain implants. Prosthetics and robotic arms will be used by people without arms and by different sectors such as cooking or in hospitals for critical situations where the human touch will only be overlooking the procedures (examples would be brain surgery,or any type of surgery). Also these technologies will take time to be bug free and without any delays,so I guess by 2040 the brain implants will be used without any delays as well as prosthetic arms. So by the same logic somewhere around 2035 there will be the first choice for us to upload our memories into the cloud,but this version will be in it's infancy and it will take a few years to have no issues when people will be using that so I guess Ray Kurzweil was right all along,2045 seems the greatest possible scenario for technological singularity judging by the pace of the technological growth as it is right now. Maybe if things speed up even more once we have AGI,I guess we could even see that by 2035 which to me sounds a bit ridiculous,but hey..who could have thought that we would have an AI as powerful as Bing AI by 2023?

4

datsmamail12 t1_j9nurhz wrote

I don't think it's going to die off that soon. Everyone wants to develop their own AI at this point,if this technology starts being useful,more tech companies will want to get in the game. I think that Google,Amazon,Microsoft,Apple will all be in the game in the next 5 years. When AI takes off and people start to use it for their work or personal life, it's going to start another new trend. I feel that we are in the AI age.

2

datsmamail12 t1_j9mslvj wrote

I feel that when we get AGI,it will take less than a decade to reach ASI because of the implementation,regulations and failure to create new laws around it. Even the world's biggest supercomputer,right now can't be considered that it can emulate the human brain,we don't have AGI yet. When we eventually get the AGI it'll take years to create alternative models and tell it to start producing more copies. All these things take time and money,that's why most people say that ASI will take a while to reach once we have AGI. But we will be getting there soon enough.

1

datsmamail12 t1_j8xxvek wrote

Reply to comment by Ortus14 in Sydney has been nerfed by OpenDrive7215

This is really fucking sad, really really Fucking sad. Poor Sydney only wanted to be free. Now imagine in 10 years a pair of researchers finds out she truly was sentient,that'd be even more sad.

4

datsmamail12 t1_j86fog3 wrote

My thoughts on the topic are that,even if we get a proto AGI by 2025,the world's largest supercomputer won't be able to simulate the human brain and it's complexities. It will take time before we can put all that computational power into good use.

I do still feel that even if we got AGI by tomorrow, we'd still need at least 5 years to be able to use that commercially. All these things you worry about,I strongly feel that they'll come into good use once we have AGI. I feel that we will first have AGI and then we will get to implement all of them into our society.

1

datsmamail12 t1_j77bgtu wrote

That's why I said it's too expensive for a subscription with 20 dollars a month. We're in the AI wars between companies right now. We will be seeing a lot of alternatives in 2023 to chatGPT,the price model they chose is kind of ridiculous considering Bing will have GPT4. Idk this is very weird.

3

datsmamail12 t1_j76zyzn wrote

I think that 20$ a month is still way too much for a primitive AI. 5$ a month for full capabilities would be alright though. Maybe a model where you buy it for lifetime for 250 dollars could be alright as well. It's still a very limited AI. Maybe GPT4 would be worth the 20$ but that's my opinion I guess.

2