Submitted by Rhaegar003 t3_127l11b in singularity
SkyeandJett t1_jeexe6t wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
We'll see. I hope you're wrong. Once you get to "do this task" it won't care if that's "move a box" or "solder a refrigerant line".
Zer0D0wn83 t1_jef9lfu wrote
I also hope I'm wrong. A task != any task though. The level of dexterity and movement required is difficult. I'm thinking more from a hardware than a software perspective.
SkyeandJett t1_jefa2m9 wrote
OpenAI was solving Rubik's Cubes one handed 3 years ago. I think state of the art with the massive investments going into the field will surprise everyone.
BigMemeKing t1_jefmcx4 wrote
Youre also thinking more from a human perspective, it's hard to do for humans because of our hands. A robot with specific attachments could do the job much easier. And it could just be a generalized attachments that could be used for multiple purposes. Or an attachment station that allows the bots to pre equip for a specific task.
Zer0D0wn83 t1_jefn6if wrote
Like a vacuum cleaner?
BigMemeKing t1_jefn9ml wrote
I mean basically, why not?
Zer0D0wn83 t1_jefnfsr wrote
I can't think of a good reason why not, tbh.
KaliQt t1_jeftx4r wrote
While true, I think companies will rush to fill that role. Because we haven't had good general software to power the robots until recently, they didn't think to go past the initial hardware.
If general purpose robots become commonplace, naturally the next step would be to increase their performance and capabilities including making specialized robots. And it'll happen very quickly.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments