I both agree and disagree, but im too inebriated to flesh my position. I think raise really good point but stop short of the effect the people building the dataset have on the outcome of the results.

We can see our bias, we often don’t admit to it. We can also build highly objective datasets, nothing is perfect bias is a scale. My argument is effectively that the bias we code into system as living participants is much worse than bias coded into an ai that was built from altruistic intention. Every day a human making a decision can exercise a wildly differing gradients of bias, an ai will be consistent.