>institutional racism

Lost me here, this isn't a real thing.

No interest in going on this tangent further, nor was it my desire to laser focus on one thing that is moot to my general argument that anything capable of identifying repeating data ie. patterns, and has the capacity to react/adapt/interact/etc is going to formulate a bias, that nothing capable of learning, is capable of being unbias and finally that bias itself isn't good or bad it just IS.

I too am inebrieeated.

Yeah and we all know how well FORCED diversity is going. Minorities are a minority because they are the smaller group. Nothing one way or the other people stating that fact. But that;s another rant for another subreddit.

I'm simply saying that a system that identifies and reacts to patterns is going to form a bias because that's why bias is, doesn't make it inherently evil, right or wrong, just IS.

I disagree. A repeat in data causes a pattern, and when a pattern is recognized, that forms a bias. The terminology used kinda muddies the water a bit in that some people think biases are dishonest, or that a bias is simply a difference in opinion.

If a system is able to recognize and react to patterns, then it will form a bias. Might be safe to assume that an AI can't have unfounded bias. I do not believe it's possible to be completely unbias unless you are incapable of learning from the instant you exist.

We are a constitutional republic.

Our system still supports democracy, but we've gotten too complacent as we let our rights slowly be eroded under falsities sold to the American people. We've let the centralized federal government get too powerful, but as long as the constitution exists, there's a chance we can reset and get back to being America again.