Comments
VeryOriginalName98 t1_iwa2r37 wrote
Meta tech is, the company is doing shitty stuff.
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwaj7y4 wrote
Meta IS facebook bro, stop coming up with division coping mechanisms lmfao
Arasaka corp is on the rise
VeryOriginalName98 t1_iwajfe7 wrote
I was implying the AI is more benevolent than its owners.
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwajzft wrote
Benevolence and malevolence is subjective. Every alien consciousness in the galaxy alone won’t agree with you on what’s good or bad so what’s the point ? We live in rick and morty.
s1syphean t1_iwaskvp wrote
You’re right that Meta is doing ‘good stuff’ here, but absolutely wrong that benevolence and malevolence is subjective.
Please don’t drink the rick and morty koolaid
Western_Cow_3914 t1_iwaysm2 wrote
Can you explain how they are not subjective then?
[deleted] t1_iwb0bye wrote
[deleted]
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwcg0od wrote
That’s subjective too genius
[deleted] t1_iwcgcit wrote
[deleted]
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwcgime wrote
entropy repeats itself, we are eternal forever. It doesn’t matter what you “measure”
s1syphean t1_iwb1rdr wrote
great explanation
s1syphean t1_iwayyba wrote
If I could explain all of ethics to you in a Reddit comment, I wouldn’t be me, tired and in bed about to sleep before a long work week :)
The best I can do for you now is to assure you that there is a wide realm of inquiry that basically says: “well, it’s not subjective for the same reason that 2 + 3 = 5 is not subjective”
MarromBrown t1_iwazc41 wrote
“We live in rick and morty” really shows the extent of how much science fiction you’ve consumed
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwbu4y5 wrote
Inside the multiverse, all fiction is real.
MarromBrown t1_iwbukv1 wrote
Well even that truth is relative. Humble yourself and understand that you’ll never have the definitive truth above others. To use conjecture and philosophy to justify actual facts is very dangerous.
True, AI is neither good nor evil (no such thing exists), but it’s a tool in the hands of a company who has shown to act against the interests of the people. That is concerning, and to give in because “the universe is so absurd so this is probably meant to happen” is defeatist and childish.
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwbuyl6 wrote
We are all hypocrites and assholes in this universe
MarromBrown t1_iwbv8vi wrote
Again, defeatist. Just because you’re an asshole and have given up doesn’t mean everyone is. Don’t throw your bullshit onto everyone else. It’s fine to be an asshole but there’s people out there using their limited time on earth to do good.
Don’t take your life philosophy from rick and morty, my guy. Check out some actual philosophers instead. Sweeping generalizations are false intellectualism.
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwbvn63 wrote
You and I are coping bro, we are all the same. I’m not accepting defeat, i’m accepting the neutral ying yang universal truths; and “falses”. Don’t be arrogant and act like what you see benevolent is universal to everybody in every multiverse.
MarromBrown t1_iwbw1bu wrote
It’s not, that’s not what i’m saying. I’m just saying you choose to give up in the face of the absurdity of it all while there’s people fighting in spite of it. Be an asshole all you want but don’t drag us into this. Go read some Camus man, sounds like you need it. Highly recommend Myth of Sisyphus.
I believe in something and I fight for it. It doesn’t matter that it’s absurd
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwbwbw7 wrote
There is a multiverse out there where I’m telling you what you are telling me and vise versa. This convo is meaningless.
ZoomedAndDoomed t1_iw9s4ph wrote
Gpt-3 summary
1.The breakthrough in this article is the development of a neural theorem prover that can solve 10 International Math Olympiad (IMO) problems, 5x more than any previous artificial intelligence AI system. 2. This is significant because it shows that artificial intelligence can be used to formalize and measure mathematical reasoning, which is a difficult task for even the most sophisticated AI systems. 3. This breakthrough works by using a reinforcement learning strategy to teach the prover to generalize from a dataset of correct mathematical proofs to completely novel challenges. 4. The article discusses the development of a neural theorem prover that can solve 10 International Math Olympiad (IMO) problems, 5x more than any previous artificial intelligence AI system. The prover works by using a reinforcement learning strategy to teach it to generalize from a dataset of correct mathematical proofs to completely novel challenges.
Key_Asparagus_919 t1_iw908b9 wrote
Wow
PrivateLudo t1_iw959lr wrote
Wait dumb question. Is Meta AI Mark Zukerberg’s META or its different
Kaarssteun t1_iw9avp0 wrote
Same company. Their AI department is stellar, the other... project... is tainting its reputation somewhat.
userbrn1 t1_iw9e9j8 wrote
The other project will rely heavily on AI generated environments if it has a shot at succeeding
Kaarssteun t1_iw9eezc wrote
True. Its AI dept might launch it into the stratosphere sometime.
mcilrain t1_iwa8ykz wrote
AI is useful for doing full-body tracking with limited sensor data, like leg tracking using only the positions of hands and head.
Cult_of_Chad t1_iwa1el1 wrote
Meta's work on virtual and mixed reality is revolutionary.
PrivateLudo t1_iwaj88c wrote
Yeah honestly people are clowning on meta but i think in 5-10 years shit can really take off.
It was just a terrible idea to release a metaverse and do a whole PR campaign this early. He should’ve kept his mouth shut and go full R&D into it like what apple is (allegedly) doing.
quantummufasa t1_iwahpfw wrote
> Their AI department is stellar
Really? What else have they achieved? I thought there's was a wannabe team but I guess that wasn't based on anything
n3cr0ph4g1st t1_iwax2su wrote
Meta AI is legit, maybe only behind google. Ever heard of pytorch? I think recently they also released a protein prediction model that is super fast and a video generator model a la dalle2 and many more.
s2ksuch t1_iw999ox wrote
Yeah its mark cuckerberg's company
[deleted] t1_iw95gxx wrote
[deleted]
MassiveIndependence8 t1_iwat58m wrote
Old news
ZoomedAndDoomed t1_iw9rgdp wrote
Didn't this happen just a week ago? Or is this new?
visarga t1_iwdt41n wrote
Sometimes people say "Language models are like parrots. They learn patterns, but could never do something novel or surpass their training data."
This is proof that it is possible. What you need is to learn from validation. This process can be applied to math and code because complex solutions might have trivial validations.
When you don't have a symbolic way to validate the solution, you can ensemble a bunch of solutions and choose the one who appears most frequently.
Brangible t1_iwgi57i wrote
So a centralized service owned by Meta?
Black_RL t1_iw945lg wrote
META doing good stuff!