Kaarssteun
Kaarssteun t1_j8cn0uh wrote
Well, you kinda were asking for it imo. Internet searches dont usually start like this
Submitted by Kaarssteun t3_10zxpzy in singularity
Submitted by Kaarssteun t3_10w9zp2 in singularity
Kaarssteun t1_j5kshqa wrote
Gary often raises valid criticism - the believability of which is completely drained when he posts some weird ass takes - Him heavily implying cynicism because of a fundamental limitation in LLMs, something he should be aware of
Kaarssteun t1_j3hwuzi wrote
Reply to Organic AI by Dramatic-Economy3399
AI needs a loss function - just like us humans need motivation. For us, this ranges from eating food, to having sex, to being happy because of something else - these must be defined in an AI much the same. Letting an empty neural network roam around will not achieve anything
Kaarssteun OP t1_j2d6qvk wrote
Reply to comment by chadbarrett in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
Remember, LLMs are prone to hallucination; it can't "find" anything per se, and is a pathological liar.
Kaarssteun OP t1_j29yyjh wrote
Reply to comment by Mementoroid in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
The prisoner is bailed out
Kaarssteun OP t1_j29curp wrote
Reply to comment by hauntedhivezzz in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
As i said, i know and love they work together closely, but that's not confirming chatgpt will be integrated into bing
Kaarssteun OP t1_j29cl0a wrote
Reply to comment by hauntedhivezzz in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
Isnt that just a rumor so far? I love that microsoft is working with openai so closely, but has that been confirmed?
Kaarssteun OP t1_j29bhnn wrote
Reply to comment by lloesche in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
I do think people would bat an eye if they started charging money - to the layperson, this feels like google, and google has been free forever.
Kaarssteun OP t1_j29a9ad wrote
Reply to comment by hauntedhivezzz in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
That's the thing - this going viral is costing them millions. There is no product for them to sell given people now expect this service to be free.
Submitted by Kaarssteun t3_zz3lwt in singularity
Kaarssteun t1_j293ctq wrote
Reply to comment by blah-blah-guy in the singularity is already a threat to our mental well-being by Ohigetjokes
- blah-blah-guy
Via: Reddit
Kaarssteun t1_j292qsy wrote
Reply to Revolutionary machine learning weather simulator by DeepMind & Google’s ML-Based "GraphCast" outperforms top global forecasting system. GraphCast can generate accurate 10-day forecasts at a resolution of 25 km in under 60 seconds. by vegita1022
Weather forecasting is one of those fields where I expected advances to be negligible due to two things: Sheer amount of time already spent on it, and the butterfly effect. Happy to see Deepmind doing their thing and proving me wrong again.
Kaarssteun t1_j25bl79 wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence expect for the future? by kmtrp
Honestly an argument for us not being batshit crazy. 10% of scientists & well-informed people is a whole lot better than 0%
Kaarssteun t1_j1yxkx5 wrote
Reply to comment by Baron_Samedi_ in Considering the recent advancements in AI, is it possible to achieve full-dive in the next 5-10 years? by Burlito2
Im not saying it will break the physical laws per se - but it really might. Everything we know, we know with our human intelligence, which will be surpassed. A dog might think his master never runs out of food, that may be a "law" in his mental world, yet it is painfully obvious to us humans that it's wrong.
Kaarssteun t1_j1w28a8 wrote
Reply to comment by Baron_Samedi_ in Considering the recent advancements in AI, is it possible to achieve full-dive in the next 5-10 years? by Burlito2
ASI being superhuman by definition, it will find a way around those.
Kaarssteun t1_j1uvhga wrote
Reply to comment by ihateshadylandlords in Considering the recent advancements in AI, is it possible to achieve full-dive in the next 5-10 years? by Burlito2
FDVR is ASI + 3 months. I don't think we as humans are capable of the technical feat - especially before AI.
Kaarssteun t1_j18kwoj wrote
Reply to Google Declares “Code Red” over ChatGPT by maxtility
paywall
Kaarssteun t1_j10z3u9 wrote
Reply to comment by MyCuteData in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
Okay. Let us rephrase then. The deciding factor is when ASI arrives - capable of achieving feats us humans have little to no chance at achieving; FDVR being one of them. Hence, I predict FDVR arrives 2-3 months after ASI does.
Kaarssteun t1_j0udpg9 wrote
Reply to comment by civilrunner in Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
Right, enslaving is subjective; but we want to make sure it enhances our lives rather than destroying it.
Kaarssteun t1_j0ucilx wrote
Reply to comment by civilrunner in Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
It's not our goal to replicate a human brain; that's what making children is for. We are trying to replicate the brain's intellectual intelligence in a way that enslaving it would still be ethical.
Kaarssteun t1_j0uc0fc wrote
Reply to comment by PulsatingMonkey in Prediction: De-facto Pure AGI is going to be arriving next year. Pessimistically in 3 years. by Ace_Snowlight
??
Sam Altman thinks AGI will arrive sooner than people think, but will have a lesser, slower impact than most think at the same time.
Kaarssteun t1_j0s73ps wrote
Reply to Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
100% a software problem. There is no guarantee, but the trends don't lie. Chances of AGI never arriving are... astronomically small.
Kaarssteun t1_jaa80vg wrote
Reply to Singularity claims its first victim: the anime industry by Ok_Sea_6214
u/sashinii already know youve been waiting for this