Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DruAndrew t1_iztiec3 wrote

Yeah, the USSR got rid of the actual Marxists pretty quickly once the "communist party" got power. Authoritarianism is the antithesis of everything Marx wrote about.

2

MattSpokeLoud t1_izu4x7s wrote

Unfortunately, the theory to support authoritarianism comes from Engels, not Marx. This is the origin of the largest split in socialist movements, leading to anarchist and communist identities to differentiate their perspective on the state.

0

DruAndrew t1_izu6vny wrote

Totally. That is why I don't consider "communists" to be Marxist. That is why I give pushback on people suggesting that USSR, China, and the rest are "Marxist." in common parlance, the term "Marxist" is just another way of saying "I haven't ready anything by or about Marx, but I don't like authoritarians."

Dude isn't an easy read, so I get not wanting to take the time. but it is frustrating that a good theory has become a straw-boogyman. I'm with the constitutional peasants. do you know of an Anarcho-syndicalist commune I could join?

1

MattSpokeLoud t1_izu8jo8 wrote

I can agree with that, which is one reason why I often don't identify as just a Marxist, because Marx was not correct on everything and newer philosophers have added much, such as the Frankfurt School of philosophers and the field of Critical Theory.

Google for cooperatives in your area, I am a member of a food coop and support local CSA associations/orgs. As for labor unions, see if one exists in a larger federation, if not there is an achievable process to start your own union.

Anarcho-syndicalism would be a long-term project that involves the proliferation of the above organizations as well as further cooperation between them.

0