Comments
[deleted] t1_j5k22j1 wrote
There is no doubt google is superior, the question is, will Google show their real capability this time? I've read some comments saying that Google might fall behind, but I seriously doubt it because they are still way superior and they are likely to continue being superior, so even if Open AI releases a super AI (GPT-4), all it takes for Google to regain their throne is to release an even more superior AI (I'm pretty sure they have one or several ones). Google is taking its time, the moment they make a serious move we know that's them trying to say, check mate.
ziplock9000 t1_j5k978s wrote
That's a circular argument.
'They are superior, because they are superior' is the essence of what you've just said.
Practical-Mix-4332 t1_j5kbd7n wrote
I took it as they are superior because they have the internal knowledge and talent and years of experience at the bleeding edge of AI research, so based on those circumstances they are well-situated to continue their dominance in the field.
[deleted] t1_j5kazfw wrote
When did I state "They are superior, because they are superior" my statement was "I seriously doubt it because they are still way superior and they are likely to continue being superior". There is a clear difference, my statement talks about them being superior and that they will also be superior in the future, but I nowhere defend why they are superior because that wasn't my intention with that statement... The key is that the intention of my statement was to inform why they are likely to win the AI race rather than to argue why they are superior.
[deleted] t1_j5n6en1 wrote
I think a great many people on this sub are just dumb. Like what you were saying was pretty clear and absolutely not what that guy claims you were saying lol
crua9 t1_j5l6c0t wrote
> will Google show their real capability this time?
I think the bigger question is will they release it. Like they can show it all day long. But look at the Google grave yard. They are pretty famous for not letting things go to public and then out of no where killing it off.
Like I don't think they will kill it off. But IDK if they will bring it to the public.
YobaiYamete t1_j5mxczg wrote
Yep, this is where I'm at. They showed their AI scheduling a haircut ages ago, but Google Assistant is still extremely dumb compared to Chat GPT
Until they put something I can use in my hand, they are a vaporware company on the way to go down in history next to all the other huge names that didn't adapt to change
RabidHexley t1_j5obf5s wrote
If their tech is around as good as ChatGPT, I understand their apprehension. ChatGPT reaches the level being just good enough to be dangerous. And Google is already dealing with an abundance of regulatory scrutiny. An AI that can easily instruct you on doing criminal activity, or confidently spits out misinformation as fact was likely a can of worms they'd rather kick down the road.
People really do want to use this technology though, so their hand is being forced.
1996Primera t1_j5m5fht wrote
This ^^
Google has YEARS Of modeling data that drwarf openai's
People just aren't aware since they haven't seen it or used it
Now Google has pressure to use more ai in their search results but have to dance the line of good enough results that have ads this more revenue for Google
Vs really good search results which would limit their revenue
ski-dad t1_j5mcb3l wrote
This raises a good point, which I hadn’t considered. Maybe what is actually so mind-blowing and disruptive about GPT-n is just that it isn’t trying to sell them anything.
RabidHexley t1_j5l12ui wrote
Exciting stuff. If one thing can be attributed to ChatGPT at the very least it's actually kicking off a ton of renewed interest in the field. Without the public splash and interest from Microsoft the timeline likely would have been pushed back quite a bit.
tatleoat t1_j5kd9cy wrote
Race is on
HeinrichTheWolf_17 t1_j5l16vc wrote
Regardless, competition here is good.
ziplock9000 t1_j5k9141 wrote
If they do, it wont be free and they will cancel the project in 9 months.
rixtil41 t1_j5mgpyc wrote
Like Netflix
paulyivgotsomething t1_j5osq4y wrote
i think it is going to be difficult for them to avoid the death spiral. Lets say 20% of their users migrate to Cgpt or other Chat service. they then need to put up 20% more ads to make the same amount of money. the remaining users then think wow there are so many more ads then before im going to try Cgpt. and the cycle continues. We are now at peak Google. this is what happens to monopolies when their business models are disrupted by new technology, google is no different.
turnip_burrito t1_j5m4r19 wrote
They can compete. They have the technology. Question is, can they do so without destroying their revenue?
Fabulous_Exam_1787 t1_j5m6ckl wrote
Competition is great, but we all know Google will hype it up for 1 year and then silently cancel it or throw it on the back burner and effectively cancel it through neglect.
BackgroundResult OP t1_j5n4279 wrote
Google will put out a lot of A.I. products in 2023, but most of them won't pan out and they may not find a "killer utility application" like ChatGPT in quite the same way!
If Bing managed to steal market share from Google and in search Advertising, it's also a battle of Azure vs. Google Cloud don't forget.
Lawjarp2 t1_j5o7la3 wrote
Demis Hassabis, did say they are working on making LLMs that are more factual or reliable. Google is afraid of failure rate of LLMs. They don't want to put something into the market that gives out too many wrong results.
BackgroundResult OP t1_j5jy7sv wrote
Google will announce a ton of A.I. products in its I/O event in May, 2023 but with GPT-4 and ChatGPT, will it be enough to respond to Microsoft and the pace of OpenAI's momentum?