Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

turnip_burrito t1_j32ob9d wrote

It is simple. What the definition of "consciousness" should be to begin with is subjective. But once you define something, you should not contradict it unless you explicitly change which real world things it is describing.

How silly would it be for me to define dogs as "canines kept as pets" and then later say "well, dogs don't have to be canines"? That's what has happened with ChatGPT.

−11

Feebleminded10 t1_j3346ky wrote

That makes no sense bro how the ai clearly explains its point and logic but you still don’t get it? At the end the person said reply how a teacher would too.

2

turnip_burrito t1_j3378fq wrote

It clearly explains it in a way that is incorrect.

−3

mulder0990 t1_j33hto1 wrote

Is a square a rectangle?

Things can be defined and have nuanced change based on new knowledge all while keeping its original definition.

1

turnip_burrito t1_j33mwbc wrote

Not if the definition is "B is A" and the nuanced change is "B is not A". Try making those coexist together. You can't. lol

I can't believe people are defending this. It's a chatbot. And it contradicted itself. It does this often if you play with it.

1