Submitted by Rezeno56 t3_10nat66 in singularity

In order to reach post-scarcity, a nanofabricator is needed that can assemble anything from raw materials to useful things like food, tech, clothes, and etc. Once AGI is created at some point in the future, the field of nanotechnology will accelerate. In turn, will result the creation of the nanofabricator.

A video below as an example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spr5PWiuRaY

48

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

agonypants t1_j68f0og wrote

Over the past 20 years or so I've become convinced that people alone are not yet smart or skilled enough to produce this kind of technology. The technology is absolutely achievable. The most compelling example of this kind of "tech" is biology itself - living, growing things. Cells turn nano-scale work into macro-scale products every single moment of every day. People, working together under a large-scale, coordinated effort can eventually create machines capable of this same feat. But...I think we will need AI assistance to get there. My hope is that an AGI can assist us on the path to this goal within the next several years. But without AGI, I fear it will be a long time.

18

vom2r750 t1_j67zbd4 wrote

What people call replicators in scifi

It would be a massive game changer

I hope they are not managed by big tech with the usual scammy programs and subscriptions

Where you get the shitty free version with imprinted commercials and ads or low quality

Or if you pay lots You get the Gucci ad free one

Or is it going to be like a game Where you have to unlock gears and qualities as you complete environmental missions

Can’t we just do for once something nice for everyone?

7

KSRandom195 t1_j6859di wrote

It’s all about money right now. If you let the people make anything then manufacturing companies, farmers, and a whole slew of other industries will go out of business.

That has to be offset by something, which will likely be the distribution of raw materials. Imagine the “carbon guy” showing up to deliver your weeks order of carbon for the fabricator.

As mentioned elsewhere energy is a massive aspect of this, these machines will likely need a lot of energy to work. Not sure you’d be able to just plug it in to your wall socket. That will likely mean the manufacturing companies will use them first as they’d have the resources to set up the energy requirements. But the fiat may be so high that just paying people to do it is better.

7

Milkstrietmen t1_j685cr8 wrote

This was posted 15 years ago. Is it ready yet

4

Technical-Berry8471 t1_j687vyq wrote

A nanotechnology based fabrication technology would be beneficial to the development of a post scarcity society, but not essential.

2

DonOfTheDarkNight t1_j68f9pt wrote

Why do you think it won't be essential? Coz of UBI and UBR?

1

Technical-Berry8471 t1_j68rv4l wrote

We have the technology now to provide for all, we simply choose not to. Free health care in the United States, functioning in a manner similar to that common in the European Union, is possible, but the majority choose not to allow its introduction.

The singularity will hopefully be the catalyst for the social change, and social expectation, that will be the foundation for the development of a post scarcity civilization.

6

cantbuymechristmas t1_j68sl09 wrote

there will also be genetically modified organisms that we use as tools but that’s when things are gonna get weird. like growing chairs and other furniture from seed

2

Cr4zko t1_j67t20w wrote

They can assemble ANYTHING, though?

1

Rezeno56 OP t1_j680lsm wrote

Only small stuff.

0

agonypants t1_j68fn29 wrote

Small products can easily be assembled into larger objects - especially when the interfaces between parts are using nanotech to bond to one another.

4

Cr4zko t1_j680udp wrote

So if I want a warehouse full of Chevy Novas what should I do? Cry?

0

agonypants t1_j68fw5r wrote

Drexler outlines a vision for a nano-printer at the scale of a garage wall that can crank out a fully assembled, ready to drive new car every 15 minutes.

6

rixtil41 t1_j68ni8k wrote

Helpful no doubt but not needed. A changed economy would do it. One example to sustain post scarcity without nanofabricators is to limit the amount that an individual can request. So imagine that on your app or when you go eat at a restaurant imagine instead of say it cost 5 dollars it says 5 daily. Meaning you can only get that item 5 times a day.

1

Tall-Junket5151 t1_j69oc6s wrote

The way the video describes such a machine would be so impossibly impractical. Moving parts are a nightmare to deal with, one little breakdown of any of those nanoscale moving parts would cause the entire thing to stop working correctly.

A more practical design for a nanofabricator wouldn’t brute force atoms together with nanoscale factory machines, but would instead use precision lasers to both breakdown the starting molecules and as a catalyst to overcome the potential energy necessary for atoms to bond in a particular configuration.

Not even to mention the scaling issue with the machine approach, with precision lasers, it’s infinity more scaleable and to scale up all you would need is more lasers that work in coordinating.

1

Rezeno56 OP t1_j6azy8z wrote

Correct, which is why the video shows an example of what a nanofabricator will look like. Nanofabricators in the future, will not look like that in the video.

1

TheSecretAgenda t1_j67x8jb wrote

You are going to need massive amounts of energy for that to work. Better get that cold fusion reactor working first.

0

94746382926 t1_j693pni wrote

Or bodies do it for organic materials on a pretty cheap energy budget.

3

TheSecretAgenda t1_j69qz2v wrote

Our bodies don't do alchemy. I'm talking about turning sand into gold.

1