Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

the68thdimension t1_j6jcmk6 wrote

You wrote a whole lot of words for nothing, man, I agree with you. I never said the jobs were replaced 1:1, nor that the same people working at McDonalds would get those jobs. How about before taking the absence of words negating something as an argument for that thing, and then writing an essay about it ... you just ask for clarification?

In any case, nothing you said negates my point about UBS.

0

crua9 t1_j6jgw0m wrote

>In any case, nothing you said negates my point about UBS.

I was just getting into the part where you're factually incorrect.

>I never said the jobs were replaced 1:1, nor that the same people working at McDonalds would get those jobs.

Then what was the point of the comment?

−1

the68thdimension t1_j6m2b27 wrote

> Then what was the point of the comment?

Because it’s worthwhile to point out the nuance of the situation: it’s not that these jobs are lost and that’s it, but rather these jobs are lost but some others are opened up elsewhere.

It’s still a net negative loss of number of jobs, yes, but it’s not as bad as it’s made out by some.

0