Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Gym_Vex t1_j64b1cf wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]

Are you saying you can’t be creative with AI? If it was a full replacement it wouldn’t need human input also diffusion models don’t photobash (which tbh is still fair use in some cases)

1

[deleted] OP t1_j64bq85 wrote

You can be “creative” with it in that you’re inputting your ideas but you aren’t creating with it. You can order a commission with interesting ideas but you’re not making a creative work. The actual creation is not in your hands.

1

Gym_Vex t1_j64djm9 wrote

Yes the commissioner isn’t the illustrator but to say they have zero creative involvement is silly.

It seems your really hung up on the fact that ai art uses language as its input. If you had to use knobs and dials would it somehow be “creative” to you?

1

[deleted] OP t1_j64dqn4 wrote

Depends on what the knobs and dials did. How much direct control do you have?

1

Gym_Vex t1_j64h80k wrote

Same as ai art (img2img, in painting and out painting, etc.)

I’m curious as to what other art forms your don’t consider creative since they’re elements of randomness to every form of art

1