Gym_Vex

Gym_Vex t1_j9pzu9w wrote

I just want the sub to be moderated properly in accordance with its own rules :| you know there are dedicated subs for the content you want right? Why do you want to force this sub to be something it’s not?

6

Gym_Vex t1_j9pw92g wrote

Hey man if you want to eat garbage go ahead ;]

Most people hate random low effort gpt spam and would like for it to be removed from the sub. It’s just not relevant to the singularity or ai research. Sorry that the rest of us want to see things that aren’t low effort.

8

Gym_Vex t1_j64h80k wrote

Same as ai art (img2img, in painting and out painting, etc.)

I’m curious as to what other art forms your don’t consider creative since they’re elements of randomness to every form of art

1

Gym_Vex t1_j64djm9 wrote

Yes the commissioner isn’t the illustrator but to say they have zero creative involvement is silly.

It seems your really hung up on the fact that ai art uses language as its input. If you had to use knobs and dials would it somehow be “creative” to you?

1

Gym_Vex t1_j64b1cf wrote

Are you saying you can’t be creative with AI? If it was a full replacement it wouldn’t need human input also diffusion models don’t photobash (which tbh is still fair use in some cases)

1