Icy-Conclusion-3500 t1_itbs8da wrote
Reply to comment by ryanq99 in NASA Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members. The nine-month study will begin on Oct 24. by ICumCoffee
When you’ve got a sensor that is on a moving vehicle, and that sensor also moves independently from the vehicle, it’s really easy for things to look weird.
The sensor simply lost its target lock and the pilot did a bad job trying to reestablish lock and tracking. It didn’t go super fast or making weird moves, it’s just the pilot not interpreting his video feed correctly.
ryanq99 t1_itcsbxy wrote
That’s certainly a reasonable explanation, although the Navy recognizes this phenomenon and have several accounts of it. They understand their equipment. They agree there was an anomaly and all instruments were working correctly.
We’re talking about experts here. Perspective may have been what made the thing look like it was going fast. The Navy doesn’t think so though, so you must know something they don’t.
Icy-Conclusion-3500 t1_itctwz1 wrote
It wouldn’t require the instruments not working correctly
ryanq99 t1_itcw8x1 wrote
Which is why my reply also mentioned…
> Perspective may have been what made the thing look like it was going fast. The Navy doesn’t think so though, so you must know something they don’t.
Icy-Conclusion-3500 t1_itd3t1h wrote
Gotta remember that the navy has a monetary interest in this being an obscure threat.
Occam’s razor. The simplest explanation to it seeming to break the laws of physics is that it just doesn’t, especially when humans are involved.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments