Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ryanq99 t1_itcsbxy wrote

Reply to comment by Icy-Conclusion-3500 in NASA Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members. The nine-month study will begin on Oct 24. by ICumCoffee

That’s certainly a reasonable explanation, although the Navy recognizes this phenomenon and have several accounts of it. They understand their equipment. They agree there was an anomaly and all instruments were working correctly.

We’re talking about experts here. Perspective may have been what made the thing look like it was going fast. The Navy doesn’t think so though, so you must know something they don’t.

0

Icy-Conclusion-3500 t1_itctwz1 wrote

It wouldn’t require the instruments not working correctly

−2

ryanq99 t1_itcw8x1 wrote

Which is why my reply also mentioned…

> Perspective may have been what made the thing look like it was going fast. The Navy doesn’t think so though, so you must know something they don’t.

0

Icy-Conclusion-3500 t1_itd3t1h wrote

Gotta remember that the navy has a monetary interest in this being an obscure threat.

Occam’s razor. The simplest explanation to it seeming to break the laws of physics is that it just doesn’t, especially when humans are involved.

−1

ryanq99 t1_itd99fn wrote

Imagine what the world would look like today if we conducted science by saying “something is going on that breaks our understanding of the world, but it’s more likely nothing so let’s not look into it”.

0