Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AsIfIKnowWhatImDoin t1_issqix5 wrote

Yes, but closer to geothermal activity that does not exist on the surface.

0

[deleted] t1_isssu10 wrote

[deleted]

1

AsIfIKnowWhatImDoin t1_issuzh7 wrote

Vents, amigo. Vents. Not proximity, but vents. That liquid has to be warmed by something.

1

RundownPear t1_issyhfp wrote

But those vents still do not lead to a warmer ocean overall, just warm areas. Earths deep ocean isn’t considered warm because it has vent scattered across the base.

1

AsIfIKnowWhatImDoin t1_ist0bb1 wrote

You just keep moving those goalposts, dontcha'? So anyway....warm water!

1

RundownPear t1_ist6478 wrote

Being "closer to the core" doesn't mean a warmer ocean. Deeper oceans are colder. Europa's ocean, assuming it does exist since it's still just a theory based on the moons low electrical conductivity and observed ice crust, would theoretically be warmed by tidal flexing caused by its orbit around Jupiter.

1

AsIfIKnowWhatImDoin t1_ist86qw wrote

I never said 'warm ocean'--that's something you made up and are running with.

I said 'warm water' and that is very much a possibility given the depth.

1

RundownPear t1_istawim wrote

Ok, still applies to warm water. Warm water being present has nothing to do with distance from the core of a planet or moon.

1

JUYED-AWK-YACC t1_isthufp wrote

I thought that it was due to tidal forces from Jupiter, flexing the shape of the ice shell. You can’t generate heat by mixing liquid water with ice.

1