moving2ksa t1_jeamo57 wrote
Reply to comment by Gasa1_Yuno in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
Or gitmo, iraq, Afghanistan enough to get Man u, Liverpool?
Nate_tis t1_jeappe4 wrote
Newcastle is owned directly by the government. The glazers, henry… aren’t in the US government
CastleBravo45 t1_jebldif wrote
Its not.
[deleted] t1_jed3b0c wrote
[removed]
_NotMitetechno_ t1_jeau6cn wrote
Theyre not owned by countries lmao
GobiasCafe t1_jebbyq8 wrote
did a plane crash into your head too?
ThatDudeNamedMenace t1_jebpeol wrote
It crashed up his ass
Jphorne89 t1_jec5u7f wrote
You dont even what to know the hole the 2nd plane went into….
Attygalle t1_jeau0tb wrote
Both clubs not owned by countries (or investment funds directly tied to countries leaders).
Ah_None_I_Mouse t1_jebcz4x wrote
Found the deluded City can.
GnomesSkull t1_jeaue1z wrote
My tax dollars are supporting British sports teams? I knew they were being siphoned into all sorts of American teams, but British ones too?
RK4Life t1_jebs6id wrote
Yes because private US citizens should definitely be held directly accountable for decisions their government makes.
siziyman t1_jebwfu3 wrote
let's be real, that's exactly what most of the current sanctions against Russia do lmao
Thingisby t1_jec0dze wrote
Just for their own crimes.
PJTikoko t1_jedde0w wrote
I mean don’t they vote on who is the government?
RK4Life t1_jeem5lp wrote
So you’re saying people shouldn’t just be penalized for the choices of their government, but should also be penalized simply if they live in a democracy.
I can’t even begin to wrap my head around how stupid an argument that is.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments