Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Greeni170 t1_j136t7a wrote

I know nothing about baseball, so serious question. Is giving out 12-year contracts a regular thing in baseball? Is the decline in skill not as steep, because of the differences in physicality in baseball compared to both footballs for example?

30

instrumentally_ill t1_j13xsl8 wrote

Essentially it costs 10-12 years to get someone for 5-6 years of their prime.

24

marklondon66 t1_j14jqd7 wrote

It's a way of avoiding luxury taxes and also keeping player salaries lower on per year basis.

9

TylerDurden626 t1_j1372iu wrote

Definitely have more longevity in baseball. 15-20 yr careers for superstars aren’t out of the ordinary

A lot of players will develop power hitting later in their career once they figure out how to hit off MLB pitching with a wood bat.

Also players can move positions as they get older that require less athleticism. Correa can move to 3rd base (he’s a shortstop now) and extend his career by easily 5 yrs

23

gimli2112 t1_j13rnqr wrote

Albert Pujols signed a long contract with the Angels about ten years ago when it looked like he was going to break just about every hitting record there was. He never delivered, he wasn't awful but he wasn't what the Angels paid all that money for and had to pay him for the duration of the contract.

17

itsforachurch t1_j13pgli wrote

I'm a little light on details but a lot of it has to do with the payroll tax under the new CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement) between the owners and players. The Met's payroll this year is (so far) about $400 million so they will pay about $100 million in tax. The payroll tax is calculated based on the AAV of contracts. AAV stands for Average Annual Value so spreading the contract out a few extra years saves tax dollars. Evidently the math works.

10

mormagils t1_j14iynr wrote

It's not very common at all. This particular offseason has been a bit insane in that lots of players that are pretty darn good but not necessarily all-time greats are getting longer contracts. Part of this is just an unusually robust free agent market, but part of it is that some teams realized that since the luxury tax (kind of an informal salary cap) calculations factor in the average annual value of a deal, spreading the deal out longer than the player will be good or useful might actually be a net gain on the team because they can be really good for most of the player's deal and then hopefully replace them with homegrown, cheap talent on the back end of the deal.

Before this year, basically the longest deals given out were 10 year deals, and those would only go to guy who were on a hall of fame trajectory and very, very young. But now, in this offseason, it's been a bit of an arms race, in part because the Mets are just throwing absolutely obscene amounts of money at some of the best players on the market. Last year the Mets set an all time MLB payroll high with something like $230M or so. This year, the Mets payroll is over $400M with luxury tax penalties.

The Correa situation is also a bit odd because Correa already had a 13 year deal lined up with a different team, and then yesterday they delayed their announcement of the signing due to "awaiting test results" with no further information. The Mets had made a late push to sign Correa only hours before he signed that deal with the Giants, and then all of a sudden in the middle of the night we find out that Correa's deal with the Giants is gone and the Mets swooped in with this offer. VERY rarely do you see deals like this fall apart, and for the Mets to already have a new deal in place before most people even knew the old deal fell apart is completely nuts.

The Mets are just turning the entire sport on its head. And it's great for fans and players.

6

coopnjaxdad t1_j143qu7 wrote

Of note is that contracts in baseball are guaranteed. He could play 6 more years and still collect. There would be restructuring but he is going to get that money.

4