Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Tulol t1_ja67imt wrote

Yeah. How would you find out? Most images get AI upgrade anyway what’s the difference between a lot and a little?

16

rkvance5 t1_ja6t1cl wrote

While I’m not 100% sure what an “AI upgrade” is, there’s actually a huge and undeniable difference between using text to create an AI image and a photographer, who has taken a photo, using software to edit that photo.

61

thedaveness t1_ja7ti2m wrote

Like adding in a smile with teeth vs the picture you took with just their normal smile. Tech is to the point where you can do all kinds of stuff like that instantly.

8

rkvance5 t1_ja7tm8d wrote

I don’t think it’s being pedantic to say that that isn’t AI.

−10

thedaveness t1_ja7u631 wrote

Well… been in photography and graphic design for almost 20 years now and that’s all I can really think of that I could use on a daily basis that would fall under that lose definition.

The definition being that some would consider that a cheat.

2

RobotCatCo t1_ja9e6s3 wrote

At this point if the artist doesn't have good hands I'm just going to assume they're AI.

2

Scriptod t1_jabohrg wrote

Hands are fixed already! It's a brave new world! Don't trust anything you didn't see in person!

2