Tulol t1_ja67imt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A Photographer Who Found Instagram Fame for His Striking Portraits Has Confessed His Images Were Actually A.I.-Generated by PauloPatricio
Yeah. How would you find out? Most images get AI upgrade anyway what’s the difference between a lot and a little?
rkvance5 t1_ja6t1cl wrote
While I’m not 100% sure what an “AI upgrade” is, there’s actually a huge and undeniable difference between using text to create an AI image and a photographer, who has taken a photo, using software to edit that photo.
thedaveness t1_ja7ti2m wrote
Like adding in a smile with teeth vs the picture you took with just their normal smile. Tech is to the point where you can do all kinds of stuff like that instantly.
rkvance5 t1_ja7tm8d wrote
I don’t think it’s being pedantic to say that that isn’t AI.
thedaveness t1_ja7u631 wrote
Well… been in photography and graphic design for almost 20 years now and that’s all I can really think of that I could use on a daily basis that would fall under that lose definition.
The definition being that some would consider that a cheat.
RobotCatCo t1_ja9e6s3 wrote
At this point if the artist doesn't have good hands I'm just going to assume they're AI.
Scriptod t1_jabohrg wrote
Hands are fixed already! It's a brave new world! Don't trust anything you didn't see in person!
feedb4k t1_ja9c4p0 wrote
A lot - a little = diff
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments