Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Sea_Perspective6891 t1_ityao1h wrote

Reply to comment by Plzbanmebrony in Tesla faces U.S. criminal probe over self-driving claims, sources say by 3loves9

It is also still in beta which allot of people seem to forget.

−5

Snoo93079 t1_ityf9ke wrote

Just calling things beta doesn't free you from responsibility.

24

XxRocky88xX t1_ityfkys wrote

Yeah it’s a lot different when it’s just a game and the unfinished state doesn’t matter.

Kinda need to have a functioning product when you’re dealing with something automated 2 ton death machines

12

Tarcye t1_ityk40f wrote

Nor have I ever been asked if I wanted to be a part of this beta. or other people too.

Kind of the problem. As someone who rides a motorcycle in the summer months Tesla's are the single biggest danger for me followed by Chevy Suburbans.

IF you ride a motorcycle you are naturally assuming more risks. That's just the way it is. But I've had so many close calls when it comes to Tesla's some with FSD some without, that I've started to adopt a "Get the fuck away" Rule when I see a Tesla.

I will always put another car between myself and a Tesla.

4

Cryonix12 t1_itz0odh wrote

How did you know they Teslas were running fsd when having these close calls?

−2

grizzly_teddy t1_itzn23l wrote

Yes they also require you to put hands on the wheel, have lots of warnings telling you about limitations, etc.

2

Sea_Perspective6891 t1_itztnd8 wrote

Not saying it does. But people shouldn't attack a product if its unfinished. The people using FSD are just beta testing it so it won't be perfect for some time. I also expect the final product will still have issues. The beta title is mostly just a disclaimer that is supposed to prevent this kind of stuff.

2

Snoo93079 t1_iu01djf wrote

People should attack a product if it putting people in danger, which this is.

2