Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

happyscrappy t1_itrom8u wrote

Reply to comment by HerbHurtHoover in USB-C iPhone will be mandatory in Europe as EU law passes final stage by prehistoric_knight

Which particular problem?

Do you mean the voltage issue? No, Lightning has that problem for the same reason USB-C does. Because both use USB-PD and USB-PD was specified in the way it was to keep the costs of chargers down. If a phone maker had to include a 100W 4-voltage agile power supply with their phone it would lead to a lot more cost and waste of materials.

I don't get how this is a "take". I explained how USB-PD (USB-C) produces these problems. And then I explained that Lightning never performs better than USB-C does. USB-C, even with its limitations, is better than Lightning overall and never worse in any case.

0

HerbHurtHoover t1_itrvgmg wrote

Damn, man. You have no idea what you are saying, do you?

0

happyscrappy t1_its0tlr wrote

Is this your normal thing? To pretend others who clearly know this stuff well don't know what they are doing?

If you have some questions you want answered I can help. If you would prefer to insult others to divert from something you don't understand then you can just do that by your lonesome.

0

HerbHurtHoover t1_its1lec wrote

No, you just think quoting a spec sheet makes your argument valid..

0

happyscrappy t1_its1pyl wrote

Which part of my argument do you think is invalid? Do you have a question you want answered?

Or are you just hurling insults to divert from what you don't understand?

0

HerbHurtHoover t1_itse039 wrote

I already did that part...... fucking reddit man. You are just dragging the conversation along for no reason. Not everything has to he a constant back and forth.

0

happyscrappy t1_itsobe6 wrote

It takes two people to make a back and forth. If you don't like a back and forth then don't participate. You can't go blaming someone else for dragging a conversation on when you are 50% of the continuation.

You expressed something about a problem with Lightning. And asked me a question about it. But you refused to express what this problem is.

You complained my argument is not valid just because I listed some specs. But you refuse to say which part isn't valid.

I can't decide which is more ridiculous. Complaining about my argument not being valid but refusing to indicate how, asking me a question and then refusing to specific what the question actually referred to or extending a discussion and then complaining about the discussion being extended.

0

HerbHurtHoover t1_itsp52g wrote

Lmao.

I didn't say its invalid because you quoted specs. I already said why its invalid, but you have to keep pretending I didn't to keep this going.

You are just straight up lying at this point.

Buh bye

1