Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

bitter_sweater t1_iycdxom wrote

yes them need to work not be distracted by tiktok

−5

ScootysDad t1_iycekgr wrote

Was this a problem in South Dakota? Or was this a preemptive action to make sure more free publicity for TikTok?

10

Vulcan_MasterRace t1_iycf9f2 wrote

The entire app needs to be banned and removed from both app stores

20

S3HN5UCHT t1_iycfabl wrote

They should just ban the whole platform

6

Niobium_Sage t1_iycgqnm wrote

Now do it on the state level and South Dakota is now one of the top states in the union.

−5

chrisdh79 t1_iych19w wrote

This is nothing new. You’re not allowed to install any 3rd party software on government systems without admin rights.

138

UnkindlyDisagree t1_iych2p6 wrote

Now I expect a bunch of downvotes with no real reply, but is there any proof at all that TikTok poses a security risk?

The US can't just make up accusations without bringing tangible proof.

−8

Drfakenews t1_iych634 wrote

They want less pedophiles in Congress... if you wanna call that an advertisement for tiktok call it that... pesos already know about the app that's nothing new

−15

V65Pilot t1_iych9ap wrote

It's a start at least......

3

orgborger t1_iycj3mh wrote

Is this really the best way to do this..? Banning specific apps? Is Twitter, Instagram, and every other social media app not collecting user and device info?

−11

BDAS100 t1_iycm1pl wrote

We should properly use all kinds of social media.

1

cybeast21 t1_iycma0g wrote

Installing anything not related to work should already be restricted from Gov-owned device in the first place.

77

Myfirespraygunship t1_iyco9tr wrote

How the fuck was TikTok allowed on any government device?

48

wedontlikespaces t1_iycrg7k wrote

I couldn't even install our company app on my work phone without administration rights (someone forgot to install it before giving it to me). Installing literally anything is lockdown.

I assume that that is the same is true of government phones as well. I'd sure as hell hope it is.

Sp

13

afellowchucker t1_iyczy7r wrote

Yeah I’m not saying government employees should have TikTok on their phones; but we’re talking about South Dakota lol. This is more about the goofy governor trying to score some points by pretending to do something important. This is the same woman that gave trump a mini Mount Rushmore statue with his head added.

10

In-Cod-We-Thrust t1_iyd382d wrote

Wait… there’s a ‘south’ Dakota?! 😯

−2

awetsasquatch t1_iydae7n wrote

Definitely restricted on my company phone too, shoot, we're not allowed to have it on our personal phone as long as we want to connect it to my companies network.

1

marcuschookt t1_iydc8bu wrote

It's crazy to me that people use their work devices for personal stuff, government-sector or not. In my line of work we constantly have people using their shitty company-issued phones and laptops to do their own private stuff, sometimes while on the company's networks. Why do you have to upload your family vacation photos to your shared drive? Why can't you just do that on your own phone?

2

madman666 t1_iyddr6w wrote

You'd be surprised how non existent mobile device management is in some places. Especially for the higher ups that complain about everything until they get what they want.

20

thereverendpuck t1_iydgyi7 wrote

Thank god the secrets of the lesser of the Dakotas is safe!!!

1

Justkiller91 t1_iydh0dw wrote

As a sysadmin. No 3rd party apps not related specifically to the user completing their work tasks should even be installed to a company bound device. Users should be reprimanded for breaching device agreements and IT admins should be reprimanded for not locking these devices down properly.... if you want to watch shittoks do it on your own device...

1

IdonTknow1323 t1_iydmmw6 wrote

Not as much as people make it out to be. The app is really just a chromium browser that loads the TikTok website. It's really not doing anything that other social platforms aren't. The biggest concern is data collection potentially going to China, but keep in mind the US version operates under a US company, ByteDance, on well-known Oracle servers.

0

Pryoticus t1_iydqplc wrote

You would think a government-issued device would be for government business only. I was offered a company phone when I got promoted but I wouldn’t have even been allowed to put my personal email on it or any games I play on my phone.

1

Myfirespraygunship t1_iydtxdj wrote

I work for the feds. It varies by department and context but I have seen some departments issue partitioned cellphones with a personal and a business side. The idea of the personal side is to have access to social media, but some apps aren't available. In this case, even if an employee had access to a partitioned device, we likely still wouldn't allow for TikTok.

3

Mean_Job8189 t1_iydv3o1 wrote

Meth, we’re on it. Tik tok, we’re not.

7

MagicalGreenPenguin t1_iydyu2w wrote

No need for TikTok on business phones for government employees at any level.

2

Sufficient-Complex31 t1_iyeiv2j wrote

South Dakota's government can ban whatever they want from their government-owned devices, but I can't help but just suspect this wasn't one of their cybersecurity analysts' top concerning software that needed to be addressed, and more a convenient political stunt. I mean TikTok shouldn't be on a government-owned device even if it was just an American company. But now South Dakota has single handedly defeated Chicom Intelligence agencies for sure! They'll have to now go buy all the personal data on everyone in South Dakota, just like every other company or group trying to spy on you :-)

0

roboninja t1_iyepmru wrote

> Especially for the higher ups that complain about everything until they get what they want.

This is the part that people usually ignore. It's the people above the head of IT Security that cause the most issues.

12

xoctor t1_iyeu3zv wrote

Why? Nobody has ever explained what evil TikTok is actually accused of. It just seems like anti-Chinese crypto-racism. I don't see how it can collect anywhere near as much sensitive personal data as something like Facebook.

−2

WayneKrane t1_iyf95e6 wrote

I was friends with a guy in IT and he said the people who failed the phishing tests sent out by them were almost always the executives. Someone got into the CEO’s email and tried to get our controller to wire $100k to some random bank account. Luckily it takes multiple executives to sign off on that kind of transfer out.

6