Submitted by Sorin61 t3_z8njfi in technology
Comments
bitter_sweater t1_iycdxom wrote
yes them need to work not be distracted by tiktok
ScootysDad t1_iycekgr wrote
Was this a problem in South Dakota? Or was this a preemptive action to make sure more free publicity for TikTok?
Vulcan_MasterRace t1_iycf9f2 wrote
The entire app needs to be banned and removed from both app stores
Niobium_Sage t1_iycgqnm wrote
Now do it on the state level and South Dakota is now one of the top states in the union.
[deleted] t1_iycgrcd wrote
[deleted]
Niobium_Sage t1_iycgrqr wrote
On the federal level preferably.
UnkindlyDisagree t1_iych2p6 wrote
Now I expect a bunch of downvotes with no real reply, but is there any proof at all that TikTok poses a security risk?
The US can't just make up accusations without bringing tangible proof.
Drfakenews t1_iych634 wrote
They want less pedophiles in Congress... if you wanna call that an advertisement for tiktok call it that... pesos already know about the app that's nothing new
dustyrosereverie t1_iycija2 wrote
I think it is less a problem in South Dakota and more a reason for SD's governor to stoke fear of the other and further monopolize her loony fan base into disliking China.
Cyoarp t1_iycirm4 wrote
No 🤦 it's because it's owned by the Chinese government
Myfirespraygunship t1_iyco9tr wrote
How the fuck was TikTok allowed on any government device?
EmotionalPlum2102 t1_iycpgq5 wrote
Work on what? There’s nothing but cows and magats in South Dakota lol
Wings1412 t1_iycprv9 wrote
There is lots, if you care to read it google is your friend.
Small warning though it is fairly technical so if you don't know much about software it might not make any sense.
EmotionalPlum2102 t1_iycq43v wrote
In 2020 the U.S. military banned TikTok. There’s your best security breaching proof you need.
UnkindlyDisagree t1_iycqmta wrote
wedontlikespaces t1_iycrg7k wrote
I couldn't even install our company app on my work phone without administration rights (someone forgot to install it before giving it to me). Installing literally anything is lockdown.
I assume that that is the same is true of government phones as well. I'd sure as hell hope it is.
Sp
EmotionalPlum2102 t1_iyctm1u wrote
You people really confuse me. Google is a search engine
vuxanov t1_iycu0wr wrote
And all Facebooks and Google apps.
[deleted] t1_iycubhe wrote
Lol it has nothing to do with pedophiles and more to do with China.
afellowchucker t1_iyczy7r wrote
Yeah I’m not saying government employees should have TikTok on their phones; but we’re talking about South Dakota lol. This is more about the goofy governor trying to score some points by pretending to do something important. This is the same woman that gave trump a mini Mount Rushmore statue with his head added.
In-Cod-We-Thrust t1_iyd382d wrote
Wait… there’s a ‘south’ Dakota?! 😯
SmellingSpace t1_iyd3u08 wrote
HeavensCriedBlood t1_iyd7frk wrote
Survey says:
​
YES
awetsasquatch t1_iydae7n wrote
Definitely restricted on my company phone too, shoot, we're not allowed to have it on our personal phone as long as we want to connect it to my companies network.
marcuschookt t1_iydc8bu wrote
It's crazy to me that people use their work devices for personal stuff, government-sector or not. In my line of work we constantly have people using their shitty company-issued phones and laptops to do their own private stuff, sometimes while on the company's networks. Why do you have to upload your family vacation photos to your shared drive? Why can't you just do that on your own phone?
madman666 t1_iyddr6w wrote
You'd be surprised how non existent mobile device management is in some places. Especially for the higher ups that complain about everything until they get what they want.
Witty-Village-2503 t1_iydfqgs wrote
It's not, but the media needs another tiktok story for clicks
cybeast21 t1_iydfrze wrote
Kind of not surprised, seeing that we have some gov-related worker install a Zuma game or something on their work PC in the office.
thereverendpuck t1_iydgyi7 wrote
Thank god the secrets of the lesser of the Dakotas is safe!!!
Justkiller91 t1_iydh0dw wrote
As a sysadmin. No 3rd party apps not related specifically to the user completing their work tasks should even be installed to a company bound device. Users should be reprimanded for breaching device agreements and IT admins should be reprimanded for not locking these devices down properly.... if you want to watch shittoks do it on your own device...
scavengercat t1_iydhqnq wrote
It's allowed on millions of government devices. There is a bill in congress to remove it from federal agency devices but that hasn't passed. Not sure where you got your info from but it's wrong.
scavengercat t1_iydhvtf wrote
We don't have evidence those services are sending info to a foreign country.
scavengercat t1_iydibgo wrote
According to militarytimes.com, it was only banned on government devices. Troops on military installations can still use it on personal devices.
IdonTknow1323 t1_iydmmw6 wrote
Not as much as people make it out to be. The app is really just a chromium browser that loads the TikTok website. It's really not doing anything that other social platforms aren't. The biggest concern is data collection potentially going to China, but keep in mind the US version operates under a US company, ByteDance, on well-known Oracle servers.
Psychological_Web687 t1_iydno9d wrote
Lol yeah it is, reddit too. Or maybe it's just mine.
[deleted] t1_iydntq8 wrote
[removed]
GetOutOfTheWhey t1_iydpk3l wrote
But when your IT guy is your boss's son updating adobe acrobat. Maybe some shit starts getting allowed.
UnkindlyDisagree t1_iydqik1 wrote
Yeah and there are no proofs. I wanted to see what that idiot had to say.
Magical ways to steal data from American servers /s
Pryoticus t1_iydqplc wrote
You would think a government-issued device would be for government business only. I was offered a company phone when I got promoted but I wouldn’t have even been allowed to put my personal email on it or any games I play on my phone.
Letiferr t1_iydsrft wrote
We count on that
Myfirespraygunship t1_iydtxdj wrote
I work for the feds. It varies by department and context but I have seen some departments issue partitioned cellphones with a personal and a business side. The idea of the personal side is to have access to social media, but some apps aren't available. In this case, even if an employee had access to a partitioned device, we likely still wouldn't allow for TikTok.
Mean_Job8189 t1_iydurmh wrote
It was basically the department of tourism and all the state funded schools that used it for marketing that it affected
Mean_Job8189 t1_iydv3o1 wrote
Meth, we’re on it. Tik tok, we’re not.
MagicalGreenPenguin t1_iydyu2w wrote
No need for TikTok on business phones for government employees at any level.
MattJFarrell t1_iye73tv wrote
Yeah, this feels like a real non-story to me.
Frogtarius t1_iye8qc6 wrote
Pepe the frog green text IT story. Lmao.
Frogtarius t1_iye8ur2 wrote
So the nurses and make their tiktok dances "we are in this together"
Sufficient-Complex31 t1_iyeiv2j wrote
South Dakota's government can ban whatever they want from their government-owned devices, but I can't help but just suspect this wasn't one of their cybersecurity analysts' top concerning software that needed to be addressed, and more a convenient political stunt. I mean TikTok shouldn't be on a government-owned device even if it was just an American company. But now South Dakota has single handedly defeated Chicom Intelligence agencies for sure! They'll have to now go buy all the personal data on everyone in South Dakota, just like every other company or group trying to spy on you :-)
roboninja t1_iyepmru wrote
> Especially for the higher ups that complain about everything until they get what they want.
This is the part that people usually ignore. It's the people above the head of IT Security that cause the most issues.
Ill-Poet-3298 t1_iyeu21b wrote
And didn't they pay for the mockup with Covid funds?
xoctor t1_iyeu3zv wrote
Why? Nobody has ever explained what evil TikTok is actually accused of. It just seems like anti-Chinese crypto-racism. I don't see how it can collect anywhere near as much sensitive personal data as something like Facebook.
SuperToxin t1_iyf6gg8 wrote
You would be surprised how much people don’t care to monitor that stuff
downonthesecond t1_iyf6srx wrote
As South Dakota goes, so goes the nation.
WayneKrane t1_iyf95e6 wrote
I was friends with a guy in IT and he said the people who failed the phishing tests sent out by them were almost always the executives. Someone got into the CEO’s email and tried to get our controller to wire $100k to some random bank account. Luckily it takes multiple executives to sign off on that kind of transfer out.
mr_mcpoogrundle t1_iycdp05 wrote
That seems reasonable