Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ayellowsky OP t1_iy1s6v4 wrote

Do a Google search for any plant, and the knowledge panel will say that it is "Algae" in the subtitle underneath the name of the plant.

https://i.imgur.com/H4pEMfE.png

Edit: This appears to be fixed as of 12 hours after making this post. I did report it to Google via the feedback button before making the post so more likely they saw it there than here. It was like this for at least a couple days. The chaos was fun while it lasted.

149

league_of_chad t1_iy1v5yt wrote

I wonder if disgruntled alphabet employees that got laid off recently have been doing this stuff? Like removing Arnold Schwarzenegger's credits from all his movies...

42

tintooth66 t1_iy1virx wrote

Pumpkin isn't. Everything else I tried is.

5

Marchello_E t1_iy1vn42 wrote

All fun and games until you have (in some future) a system in place that (for who knows what kind of health and safety reason) relies on this plant taxonomy AI.

28

kerouac666 t1_iy1zmvs wrote

Something weird is going on with the google search algorithms. Searches returned Paul Giamatti in place of Carrey for a day or two, and I think Arnold Schwarzenegger wasn’t showing up at all for movies he was in for a day or so, and now this. Seems like there’s some tweaks going on that are changing up searches and people are speculating as to what it is or why.

45

detpistons4l t1_iy21g45 wrote

What’s up with google lately? Arnold Schwarzenegger wasn’t in the cast of all his movies for a while. They changed it now tho. Now every plant is algae. Wonder what’s up

22

McSmarfy t1_iy223vs wrote

Dwarf planet the last I heard. But they already fucked up reality like changing the future while time travelling. Any attempts to fix it breaks it more.

13

no_buses t1_iy22uzs wrote

I mean, that’s technically correct.

> … although it is tempting to think of algae as a kind of plant, it is really more accurate to think of land plants as a kind of alga.

Source

15

Pogatog64 t1_iy2306f wrote

They’re technically not wrong… but yeah this should be fixed, lol

1

BoredHobbes t1_iy23r0v wrote

seems like this keeps happening to google lately.... jim carey , arnold schwarzenegger

3

Sip_py t1_iy24mod wrote

This happened to me like 2-3 days ago for an evergreen and I was like huh, today I learned, just shrugging it off like I can't believe that's algae.

22

moneyfleas t1_iy24x2y wrote

Wow this is still going on hah

2

DieFlavourMouse t1_iy27g51 wrote

I tried "Pine" and was told that's algae. "Cyanobacteria" and "mushroom" come out correctly. "Algae" comes out as "plant".... I hope google publishes the RCA for this. I hope it's not Loab!

5

MagicTheBurrito t1_iy28rnp wrote

Yeah. Someone is hacking or exploiting a loophole in google or however its phrased. Jim Carrey and Arnold Schwarzenegger have also been removed from the cast of movie they were in.

2

D-luxxxx t1_iy2brl9 wrote

The dead internet theory is gonna lose their shit with Google’s algorithm attempting to go sentient.

3

CantEvenUseThisThing t1_iy2c3rj wrote

Google has been on a downhill slide for a while. Unchecked SEO, ads, and Pinterest have turned into a nightmare to find anything first hand. But if you want a listicle churned out by some algorithm and posted on Pinterest Google has you covered.

17

vmp10687 t1_iy2c6og wrote

Confirm. Still has that issue

2

K_Xanthe t1_iy2ck3b wrote

Lol I thought this was bullshit but it’s real! I tried Rose and Japanese oak and both are currently showing as algae.

1

JamesBond-007-- t1_iy2etar wrote

For some reason spruce is normal but anything else I look up comes up with algae.

1

Hedgehogahog t1_iy2ffry wrote

More notable algae: Tulips Baobab trees Cinnamon trees (cinnamon by itself is a spice)

3

Willinton06 t1_iy2fmpd wrote

Seems like they they let the algos leash a bit too loose and it’s going nuts lately

0

paulgnz t1_iy2gie9 wrote

Glitch in the matrix

1

Feudamonia t1_iy2mbgh wrote

Google also thinks planaria are rodents

3

Drooflandia t1_iy2p686 wrote

The hell is going on at Google? This is like the 5th weird post like this for different things I've seen today.

2

homoclite t1_iy2wpjm wrote

Well, I’m not a data scientist so I can’t evaluate this.

1

Sjatar t1_iy3aaxc wrote

Not sure where they would reverse it. The story is that if Pluto is defined as a planet the current definition of a planet has to be changed.

Specifically the line "A planet is any object in orbit around the Sun that is dominant in its immediate neighbourhood.". This happens due to big objects making small objects orbit unstable if they are close. Pluto does not do this and does not fill that criteria.

If this criteria was removed however there is a lot of additional bodies in orbit around the sun that would be planets, so it's Pluto and 200 additional planets, or Pluto as a dwarf planet.

9

cas47 t1_iy3w35f wrote

Ahahahah I was wondering about this! A few days ago I googled “sweet onion” for a recipe and was very confused by the result.

1

sumelar t1_iy4fpx0 wrote

Programmer must be a 40k fan.

1

k0nstantine t1_iy4p1il wrote

I'm still confused how this past week their algos was trying to replace searches for Jim Carrey with information about Paul Giamatti. How does that accidentally happen?

1

Marchello_E t1_iy8wdog wrote

- Nilogram: Why would the taxonomy change?
- Article: Google currently thinks all plants are algae.

Indeed. There's a growing trend of (software) dependency: pros and cons. Pro is usually cost savings, Con is the control part.

1

nekolalia t1_iybwjg9 wrote

It gets worse, right now if you google any mammal it comes up as "Fish"

1