FYI, terms like “in-demand” or “engagement” are just made-up buzzwords created by random analytics companies that track meaningless metrics like hashtags, Google searches, likes, etc. Basically everything except actual viewership. News outlets shouldn’t use companies like Parrot Analytics as actual sources for anything.

[deleted]

30 minutes of Head-On commercials from the 90s would be more entertaining than this show

It's probably 90% searches for "How shite is Gotham Knights?" or similar. It's all engagement I suppose.

suprisingly it's shite, but not as bad as it looked in the awful trailer. At the moment just watching it to see how bad it is... but got kind of suprised. It's not a 2/10, but a 4.5/10

You do realize of course that all words are just made-up.

And that when posts are made about what shows are popular based on actual viewership those posts are downvoted to oblivion because this subreddit hates the shows that are actually popular.

[deleted]

Yeah I googled it because I didn't know if it was a cartoon or what... Might watch the first episode to confirm it's shit, who knows

>You do realize of course that all words are just made-up.

Yeah, no shit. Thats not really the “gotcha!” you think it is. That’s also why I specifically called them buzzwords: empty terms that don’t say anything meaningful.

>And that when posts are made about what shows are popular based on actual viewership those posts are downvoted to oblivion because this subreddit hates the shows that are actually popular.

Ok, so?

This show is nowhere near being “actually popular.” The latest episode had 420,000 viewers and fell 31% from its debut episode.

https://tvline.com/2023/03/22/tv-ratings-gotham-knights-episode-2-the-cw/

This show is not “doing well.” The latest episode had 420,000 viewers and fell 31% from its debut episode.

https://tvline.com/2023/03/22/tv-ratings-gotham-knights-episode-2-the-cw/

Based on everything going on at the CW it’ll probably get cancelled soon.

these skinny ass teenagers? lmao