Submitted by Zepanda66 t3_y8kzpj in television
Scarletyoshi t1_it0x9bu wrote
Probably the right decision, it wouldn’t have added anything to the show besides a grotesque voyeurism.
OG-Mate23 t1_it0z5fl wrote
No, it's not and a very cop out structure of storytelling. The Crown is known for its nuance and balanced storytelling so leaving one of the most important factors that led to the monarchy nearing dissolving in the subsequent funeral is hogwash.
Scarletyoshi t1_it0zs5q wrote
It’s not as if they’re skipping her death entirely. Can’t think of anything more nuanced than deciding we don’t really need to watch Diana die to tell this story.
OG-Mate23 t1_it1eye8 wrote
Yes, it should, because from the story's perspective, she's one of the main characters of the show. We had like 3 seasons worth of her character in the story. Nobody likes an offscreen death of a character who is on half of the shows runtime, do we.
[deleted] t1_it1f22j wrote
[deleted]
mickeyflinn t1_it2bt5h wrote
> it wouldn’t have added anything to the show besides a grotesque voyeurism.
It is a show that is about nothing but grotesque Voyeurism.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments