Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

t1_ix6ie0h wrote

There is great art within the superhero genre outside of MCU and DC, but it might be unfair them to compare to John Ford, given that The Searchers is widely considered one of the greatest movies of all time.

Logan is a good exploration of failure and redemption and Legion has some of the most innovative storytelling in recent years.

3

t1_ix6jdye wrote

I mean if we're gonna talk about flexibility of western vs comic book cinema how can we not talk about the heights of the western?

I love Legion, it's a shame that something like that will never be made in Marvel's foreseeable future because there's no room for something that idiosyncratic in the MCU.

4

t1_ix6kste wrote

I was going to write something about how Westerns had more time to develop and that The Searchers was the peak of the second wave, but we're currently in the second wave of popularity for superhero movies and it does seem unlikely that there will be anything new of great artistic ambition, given that the MCU more or less has recovered all their old properties. DC might be more experimental given the failure of their cinematic universe, but they're still lacking in artistic merit outside of bright spots like The Dark Knight, even if there are entertaining diversions like Shazam and The Suicide Squad.

TV probably is where art will be for the superhero genre, just like other genres. Forgot to mention that Watchmen is another example of artistic ambition for superhero shows.

2

t1_ix6ls2v wrote

Yeah I agree on pretty much all counts. Watchmen was certainly much more ambitious.

I think it'd do the genre a lot of good if it had a B movie division much like westerns did in their golden age - a good B western could just be a mostly dialogue driven two hander with a couple of locations. I'd love to see a comic book movie like that - God knows actual comic books have done great issues like that.

3

t1_ix6m65j wrote

There are factually plenty of superhero style B movies. You just don't look for them or see them.

1

t1_ix6mvaw wrote

They don't really get made anymore. No one's making Super or Chronicle these days.

0

t1_ix6nm0t wrote

Yes they are.

Samaritan and Secret Headquarters came out this year. Thunder Force last year. B superhero B movies. Are you confusing B movies and indie films? If so, whatever the hell this is came out this year.

And those are just the clear cut "definitely superhero" films. When you stretch the genre to "people with superpowers", you get "Everything Everywhere All at Once". This year.

0

t1_ix6prl3 wrote

Samaritan has a $100 million budget, you think that's a B movie?

0

t1_ix7wcjv wrote

Pick at what you want, you are still wrong. You going to tell me the Accident Man sequel and Corrective Measures aren't B movies, too?

Never mind that's just superhero movies.

0

t1_ix80ct1 wrote

The B movie system as it was for westerns in their hay day doesn't exist anymore. They were theatrical films with low to modest budgets but had access to studio resources and up and coming talent that weren't ready for A pictures.

Jesse Van Johnson makes DTV films, and he's actually pretty good at directing even if he rarely gets a good script. He's never gonna get the next Chris Evans or whatever who needs to cut his teeth before becoming Captain America. It's actually the opposite, Johnson gets stars at the end of their careers.

I'm lamenting that superhero films don't have a true B movie system.

0

t1_ix831ag wrote

>The B movie system as it was for westerns in their hay day doesn't exist anymore.

Do we are just being disingenuous now, ok.

>I'm lamenting that superhero films don't have a true B movie system.

I bet that died after the paramount accords in 48, so no shit.

−2