Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CubistMUC OP t1_iwtrx0b wrote

> "The basics of “The Santa Clauses” go like this: 28 years into his run as Santa, a 65-year-old Scott (Allen) finds himself at a crossroads. His wife Carol (Mitchell), once an ambitious school principal, is restless and bored in the more anonymous role of Mrs. Clause; their teenaged kids Buddy (Austin Kane) and Sandra (Allen’s own daughter Elizabeth Allen-Dick) are growing up isolated and “weird,” having known no other world than the North Pole. Then, head elf Betty (Matilda Lawler of “Station Eleven,” doing her very best with what she has) finds a new loophole clause granting Scott the option to retire. Reluctant and resigned, Scott takes it, moves the family back to Chicago, and hands the keys over to single father Simon (Kal Penn), who promptly sees the North Pole as more of a business opportunity than a responsibility."

[...]

> "If “The Santa Clauses” were “The Santa Clause 4: The Santa Clauses,” its tendency to indulge the silly and saccharine could be forgiven. As a “Disney+ original series,” it’s simply bit off more “nutty fudgy teacakes” than it can chew."

10

jersace t1_iwup5j5 wrote

Would it truly be a Disney+ production if it wasn’t a stretched out series that should’ve been a movie instead?

37

HumanOrAlien t1_iwv4y8n wrote

Disney+ would be so successful if these shows were movies. Turner & Hooch, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Boba Fett, Falcon and The Winter Soldier, Hawkeye and probably a lot of other shows I haven't watched. They have a problem of taking shallow ideas that would work as a movie and turning them into shows.

13

GarlVinland4Astrea t1_iwv65kx wrote

I don’t know who decided this would be a worthwhile series. The original and best film came out in 1994, and while it’s a fun Christmas film, it’s not like it’s some major cultural watershed that needed to be a franchise.

26

bookant t1_iwvujpi wrote

Uh, oh, a lukewarm review. Tim Allen will be whining about "woke cancel culture" in 3, 2, . . . .

11