Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

TootieSummers t1_j5urlvt wrote

I’m waiting for someone here to complain that the baby in the last episode of a 20 year old show was not cast in the reboot and that it’s just gonna “take them out of it”.

−12

ArchDucky t1_j5uzat3 wrote

Its a fucking travesty that Niles isn't in this show.

72

ILoveRegenHealth t1_j5v0bj2 wrote

Much of the original cast isn't back, and neither are the writers (the very things we loved - the performances and the stellar writing). Why would any fan of the original series get excited about this?

61

Gerrard1995 t1_j5v3d76 wrote

I'm a big fan of Frasier but without Martin was bad enough (Not his fault of course)... not having Niles either is really not getting my hopes up. Where's the cork master?!

32

ILoveRegenHealth t1_j5v990v wrote

I thought of that - the thing is, Frasier's award-winning writers were from Cheers.

That's the problem with this new Frasier reboot. It's an island. Nobody from Cheers/Frasier/Wings/Modern Family (same group of writers on all shows) are on this new reboot.

I'm not saying it's impossible for a surprise hit, but it's really unlikely given the TV track record of these reboots that have almost no attachment to the previous successful group. We will have to rely on a new set of writers and that could go any way.

58

ThisIsCreation t1_j5vcm4o wrote

This is like bringing back Seinfeld without George, Kramer & Elaine. It's not worth it. What made Frasier so good is the chemistry between the cast. It felt finely tuned. This, I have no interest in watching without the core cast.

24

Prax150 t1_j5vcs6i wrote

My hopes aren't high either but Frasier itself was literally a spinoff of a show where he was one of the worst characters, so who knows? Plus if you're going to reboot something might as well try and do something a little different rather than just the same show over again 20 years later.

1

StJohnMollusc t1_j5vr00r wrote

I pray it's good, and I like to think DHP is in it but they wanna keep him as a last minute surprise

3

dashrendar t1_j5vv21e wrote

With love and a desire for more.

Love that show. It's not as good as the original but it hits a lot of the right beats, and I look forward to it stretching it's legs out (haven't finished the season yet). Just wish it had more than 10 episodes a season so we can really get to know this new cast.

5

RespectThyHypnotoad t1_j5w5797 wrote

They didn't carbon copy the teens in the show, some absolutely have similar traits but it's not all 1:1.

I think the appeal and point of doing That 90's Show is to lift from That 70's Show. Not sure why anyone would expect a different take. It's a new cast, new characters in the 90s with something familar. It should have a degree of sameness to it.

It's a comfort food comedy show.

Quality could be better but comedies/new casts need a minute to gel.

5

GigiRiva t1_j5wceyu wrote

It's so difficult for me to believe they'll find the same calibre of intelligent writers and manage the same mix of slapstick and highbrow as the original, it was all too perfect of a storm, and even discounting the absence of Martin, Niles, even Eddie, it still seems like an insurmountably uphill battle considering the standards of sitcom writing and dilution of the Hollywood writing pool that has come with the exponential increase in content volume

10

RemnantEvil t1_j5wdhbs wrote

Nobody's saying that, the concern is that the original cast had award-winning chemistry and the show's considered one of the - if not the - greatest sitcoms of all time. So to bring it back, it has to either match or exceed the original, otherwise it's just gonna be a downer. And part of trying to match or exceed the original would be the foundation of that great chemistry. Without it, you've got to bottle lightning a second time for the show to work.

11

Muad-_-Dib t1_j5wj4gu wrote

No Niles, Daphne, Roz, Bulldog or indeed Martin and Eddie for more obvious reasons.

I loved Frasier but it was a series that worked thanks to all the characters, not just the titular character.

43

Orleanian t1_j5x9yji wrote

I wouldn't call Frasier an Ensemble Cast though.

They plucked the character of Frasier Crane from the Ensemble Cast of Cheers, and developed an intimate look into his life with supporting characters.

It's a bit tougher to flip a protagonist into a successful spinoff of himself, I think.

Doctor Who did it, so it's possible, I guess.

2

Lemonwalker-420 t1_j5xl9r0 wrote

Exactly what I was going to say. Other than Frasier himself and the occasional guest appearance, Frasier had no resemblance to Cheers. This is another phase in Frasier's life and shouldn't be a simple continuation of the last.

1

hujambo11 t1_j5ye9za wrote

You mean in this upcoming nostalgia-based, cash grab reboot of a classic series with an actor past his prime, made to stream on Paramount+?

Gee, I wonder why people think it won't be good.

1

JeffCentaur t1_j5yqdtx wrote

I was planning to skip this show entirely, for the reasons being detailed in this comment section. Mainly, none of the original cast returning apart from Kelsey.

But then they announced that Nicholas Lyndhurst was joining the main cast, and I've always been a big fan of his. It'll be interesting to see him in an American sitcom.

So basically I'll be tuning in to watch the Nicholas Lyndhurst show, but I hear that Frasier character may make a few appearances on it.

2

truethatson t1_j5yye2v wrote

RIP Mahoney and Moose. If they wanted to do this right, they would at least have Gilpin, Leeves and DHP in it.
If Grammer wants to do a one man show it should be on stage as Lincoln while he grifts the local ice cream store.

6

RealCoolDad t1_j5z1faf wrote

I have morning brain still. I thought it said “Anders Holm” and I got excited.

1

PerfectZeong t1_j5z1g5j wrote

And cheers worked for the same reason and yet frasier ended up being a successful and beloved show despite having none of the other cast from cheers. I'm not saying this show will be good but who knows.

This said a series with Niles dealing with a son that has Martin's sensibilities and is a huge meat head would be amazing.

1

Prax150 t1_j5z3gaf wrote

Hell, I'm not even disagreeing with you. I liked Cheers Frasier but if we're power ranking Cheers characters? No way he goes ahead of Norm, Cliff, Sam, Carla, Woody, Coach. Maybe he's ahead of Diane and Rebecca.

1

PerfectZeong t1_j5z4bh7 wrote

Vulture asked Hyde Pierce in an interview back in June about the possibility of his appearance in the Frasier revival, to which he responded: “No one ever approached me about it so it wasn’t something I turned down. But it was also not something I was looking to do, so I wasn’t an engine behind it, either."

According to him he was never really approached but wasnt particularly interested either. Which makes sense as he definitely has been more interested in smaller but more artistically rewarding projects than trying to make as much cash as he can.

5

whythehellknot t1_j619l09 wrote

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. He probably told his agency he wasn't interested unless it was some ridiculous amount and let them handle the negotiations to which they probably just kept saying "more" until the studio said "nevermind"

3

Darmok47 t1_j61etir wrote

Ironically, I imagine the success of Frasier convinced NBC that Joey could be a good idea. Single character from wildly successful sitcom set on East Coast moves to West Coast, has new adventures with sibling...

1

canobeano t1_j64k1di wrote

Salgueiro is hilarious in Letterkenny and Shoresy. I’ll give this a shot based on her alone.

1