Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

still_deebs t1_jde46gr wrote

This means that they're slaughtered.

As if there are excess horses. Just stop

−8

Plonsky2 t1_jde49m5 wrote

It's up to you to tame them, you bronco buster, you.

6

CaliBigWill t1_jde4ojp wrote

But dont catch one yourself. That's a crime. You have to pay for your horsemeat.

Seriously sad that alot of these animal do end up as food

64

navel-encounters t1_jde5a7s wrote

thats correct, only a few actually are for personal use, the rest get turned into food.

6

MoistCoyote OP t1_jde69tk wrote

From the article:

  1. legislation was passed to update original legislation passed IN RESPONSE TO worries about herd slaughters.
  2. “Charges have also been made that the BLM has turned a blind eye to the practice of private investors adopting feral horses for the purposes of slaughter, and courts have determined that the BLM may not ignore the intent of adopters.“
5

MoistCoyote OP t1_jde6qhr wrote

“Charges have so been made that the BLM has turned a blind eye to the practice of private investors adopting feral horses for the purposes of slaughter, and courts have determined that the BLM may not ignore the intent of adopters.” Idk how much this actually means.

4

LewisEFurr t1_jde7tew wrote

....for slaughter.

25 to 50 are shipped to Canada and Mexico daily from just one kill shelter we follow. 365 days a year. They are treated like shit too.

24

TheIdiotWindBlowing t1_jdecgmp wrote

I was doing some work at a zoo and one of the workers were feeding the cheetahs. I asked what was for supper she said horse. They get feral horses for food

39

r1ch999999 t1_jdejp7f wrote

That is why I said in the traditional sense. Modern wild horses are protected for the reason you mentioned, afaik.

I've never eaten horse, to my knowledge, but I'm sure if I was hungry enough I would. We don't tend to eat horse, especially in the USA, because we have rules about what vaccines and drugs we allow in our food supply, and because horses (and dogs) are considered pets/working animals and not food, they're allowed more shots than say, cows or pigs.

I could be wrong in all of that, I'm just repeating what vets have told me.

7

No-Neighborhood2152 t1_jdeokx9 wrote

There is a problem with not allowing them to be used for food though...

Having a horse market for food puts a floor on the price of a horse. Meaning that if you cannot afford to care for a horse, feed the horse and the horse is not suitable to be sold you can send it to an auction where it will typically be sold for slaughter, not necessarily for human consumption.

The cost for putting down a horse in my area is about 400 dollars plus a travel fee. Around $750 for me in total. People that can't afford, or just plain suck, will stick the horse out to pasture and not provide food or care, or release it to the wild. I'm a horse lover so I do not like the end of life of a horse sent to a kill plant, but I would argue that the alternative is often far far worse.

61

Gibbertina t1_jdeosog wrote

Why don't they let the free market do it, isn't that their jam?

1

mattstive t1_jdes7fv wrote

The blm in Wyoming has tons of them. Come get a few.

0

Ok_Shine_6533 t1_jdet91r wrote

That used to be the case. The BLM has put a lot more protections in place to prevent that from happening nowadays. Not saying it never does, but it's much more rare (and illegal) than people are lead to believe.

3

boomstickbutcher t1_jdevgwf wrote

People are so touchy about eating horse. In Europe it’s a delicacy. And my tribe it is one our many cultural traditions, and serves as a form of respect to the horse. I understand many white Americans don’t like us Natives, but the feeling is mutual.

2

Doctor_Expendable t1_jdew8z3 wrote

Where my parents live it seems like everyone has a horse. Not as a beloved family pet, or to ride, or to work. Just to have.

You've never seen more horses standing listlessly in fields that are too small for them. No shelter in those fields. No other horses. Out of eyeline from the houses usually too.

I'd rather eat a horse than see those horses "live" like they do

28

GenJRipper t1_jdey6qc wrote

Damn I spent like 1k to put my dog down when it was her time. Spent like 10k on bills the previous 6 months to keep her around so it didn’t seem like much to me since I would have paid anything to make her healthy again. For a large animal like a horse that seems.. cheap I guess?

7

Diabetesh t1_jdeyylw wrote

"Horse meat?! Oh goodness no."

"Bbq brisket and pulled pork, awww yea."

8

rededelk t1_jdf04z7 wrote

I had a neighbor that had 2, they were tattooed with serial #s (I think liquid NO2), she was a trail rider and they were very good, well trained. I thought it was illegal to slaughter horses in the US, I could be wrong

2

WillingPublic t1_jdf16gs wrote

You are correct, but public opinion is so out of wack on this topic that it is hard to have a rational conversation.

Several years ago I was involved in a zoning process in a rural county with many active farms on it. Coincidently, someone else was trying to build an abattoir to process horse meat. This is absolutely an allowed use in an agriculturally zoned area, and the developer just needed what should have been an automatic approval. Long story short, the county turned down the approval and more-or-less said “sue us.” So even though it was legal in fact, public opinion made it illegal.

As I recall, the abattoir was being developed to process horse meat for export.

7

Greenmachine98 t1_jdf16o7 wrote

They sell them to civilians too. We have one, it's a government program.

3

Due_Platypus_3913 t1_jdf4xh6 wrote

There’s a facility that’s part of this program outside Sparks,Nevada.O Pyramid hiway,heading out to “that thing in the desert “you’re like “wow!look at all those horses,then a sign tells you what you’re looking at.

1

garlicbreadmemesplz t1_jdf7uqp wrote

There’s a documentary that came out last year about this. It’s called Nope.

2

ferrariguy1970 t1_jdf9i8r wrote

I’ve come across two wild horses while hiking. Beautiful animals, out there free.

4

adamcoe t1_jdfegtc wrote

Excess? Seems to imply that there's a stock of wild horses they keep just hanging around.

2

dinoroo t1_jdfesy4 wrote

A coworker had bought one and then told me that when they went to pick it up from a friend who it was delivered to, it was skittish, ran into a fence head-on thinking there was nothing there and died instantly….because it was a wild horse.

3

CaliBigWill t1_jdfizi0 wrote

They weren't. They were free roaming wild animals. Rounded up. Penned and potentilnally abused. Then bought en masse and sold for meat.

Whole herds that were free. Not livestock. There is a difference.

−11

january_stars t1_jdfki2o wrote

I should look into this, I'm excellent at taming wild horses. The trick is to hold the left joystick in a down and slightly to the right position the entire time, while button mashing the Calm option. Never failed with this method.

−1

BarnabyWoods t1_jdfn4jh wrote

Actually, they're feral domesticated animals, which now occupy this weird gray area where they're called "wild", but they're not managed like other large wild animals such as deer and elk. Despite the fact that "wild" horse herds increase in population by 20% per year, there's no hunting season on them, and it's illegal for anyone but BLM to round them up. In most of their range, there are no natural predators to keep their numbers in check.
So they chew up habitat that other native wildlife depend on. So in essence they're national pets, costing taxpayers tens of millions of dollars per year to maintain.

19

CaliBigWill t1_jdfq2ht wrote

So actually or not - Not Livestock.

The only way these horses cost Taxpayers any money is when the BLM gets involved. They're the ones spending the money to do these roundups, maintain holding facilities, and the large costs of the adoption program (which takes up nearly a third of the annual BLM wild horse budget of $11.6 million), 

Wild horses used to range in the millions. They're down to about 50,000. Is that not thinned enough? BLM arguments in favor of these gathers are kind of weak ranging from maintaining health to protecting them from overgrazing.
So they waste millions, not spend.

−10

CaliBigWill t1_jdfti6i wrote

Brought by Columbus in the 1490's. Close to 800. There were other explorers here before him. That's a different argument. Cortes was here in the 1500's. 700 some odd years ago.

I'm not saying they shouldn't be eaten Meat is meat.. I'm saying these type of round ups are wrong and the treatment of the horses after they're gathered is wrong. And honestly to me its disgraceful that we have to send them to another country to be slaughtered. Our own government doesn't condone eating them but if there's a profit by damn let's do it!

−3

Nyrk333 t1_jdfvj4n wrote

I've ridden tamed mustangs before. They can be excellent horses, sturdy, healthy, easy to keep, and if they spend a few winters in the wild, they don't easily spook.

3

twinsea t1_jdfvrw4 wrote

Not always, the wild ponies at Assateague are treated like celebrities and folks pay a lot of money to name them. Excess ponies are auctioned off and top pony can go for close to half a million. Average is around $17k.

3

GenJRipper t1_jdfvul8 wrote

The cost for her last months of life was she was on a ton of meds and I was taking her in like every week for assessments and check ups. She was my girl so I didn’t mind. I’m in SoCal with ties to Seattle. I was giving my dog like 15 pills a day before her GDV happened. I’m glad I got my 14 years, she was likely closer to 17-18 when she passed

2

BarnabyWoods t1_jdfw3o2 wrote

>Wild horses used to range in the millions.

You just made that up. Before the Wild Horses and Burros Act was passed in 1971, wild horse numbers were kept in check by ranchers and state wildlife officials.

As for BLM's roundups, they're required to do that by federal law. They're required to define herd management areas and set appropriate numbers for each area, and then round them up when those numbers are exceeded. This is not discretionary. You don't like the law? Complain to Congress, not BLM.

5

rebel1031 t1_jdfwmx1 wrote

I’ve adopted 3. They’re wonderful horses.

I hope to adopt again some day.

3

NorthSideSoxFan t1_jdg0h49 wrote

I'd much rather the federal government end the backdoor-moratorium on horse slaughter in this country.

I also think that most uproar over sending "wild" horses to slaughter is because they're seen as cute and have been miscoded as pets. When someone tries to do their part and eat Asian Carp out of the Mississippi watershed, for example, no one whines on the internet about how those fish are treated.

5

CaliBigWill t1_jdg19h4 wrote

Livestock” means livestock as defined in sec. 602 of the Emergency Livestock Feed Assistance Act of 1988 [7 U.S.C. 1471], as amended, insects, and all other living animals cultivated, grown, or raised for commercial purposes, including aquatic animals.

They were not grown or raised and US Law specifically bans them from being sold for commercial meat. Not Livestock

−1

Amadacius t1_jdg4f2x wrote

The crux of your argument seems to be that it free-range meat is more cruel than factory farmed meat. That if an animal lived a good life before slaughter it is more tragic than if we birthed them in a cage, deprived and abused them consistently from start to finish.

We round them up because they are an invasive species that disrupts the local ecology. We slaughter them because nobody else wants them. But every ounce of meat produced this way seems infinitely more ethical than the more systemic methods.

5

Amadacius t1_jdg6iiz wrote

They'd mainly be trying to replace small antelope and small game.

I can't say whether horse meat is really a better substitute than wild pig or anything like that.

7

dickalopejr t1_jdg90z8 wrote

No such thing as wild horses anymore. They're feral

4

neverbeenwrongb4 t1_jdggx6c wrote

The horses live on protected federal land, and the horses themselves are protected wildlife. The federal hunt and slaughter is a cull to keep their numbers in check so they don't devastate the landscape eating every last bit of vegetation and then all starve to death. They want some horses to live there safely and happily. They just can't let all of them live. The horses don't have any natural predators because wolves have been extirpated from most of the US.

2

AydanZeGod t1_jdgxp6k wrote

Basically that BLM used be like ‘I don’t care what you’re using the horses for’ except now they’re going to be like ‘I don’t know what you’re using the horses for, I’m just going to sell them’

3

AdamsXCM101 t1_jdh63us wrote

I have a BLM burro. I take her for walks in the desert.

1

Pinglaggette t1_jdhar7i wrote

Feral horse populations come from the American Civil War, not from the first instances of Eurasian horses arriving in North America. The Union couldn’t afford to house and feed the massive amounts of cavalry horses they had acquired for the war, so they just let them loose, figuring that they wouldn’t survive. Well, they did and they are literally destroying the environment and killing off the actual native populations out there.

1

CaliBigWill t1_jdhsys4 wrote

You're trying to tell.me there were no wild horses in the US from 1500-1865?

You're dismissing 300years of history?

Early explorers and settlers chronicled the presence of horses throughout North America. In 1521, herds were seen grazing the lands that would become Georgia and the Carolinas. Sixty years later, Sir Francis Drake found herds of horses living among Native people in coastal areas of California and Oregon. In 1598, Don Juan de Oñate described New Mexico as being “full of wild mares.

And those weren't European horses..

0

Eukre t1_jdi0pl9 wrote

I've been all around this country and I haven't see much free of anything aside squirrels and birds. In world where even Equine aren't safe, shesh.

And what does "excess" even mean to the federal government.

1

Pinglaggette t1_jdi1ks3 wrote

You’re misunderstanding what I’m saying. Yes, there were horses in the US in earlier times, introduced by early Europeans (and yes, they were European horses. American horses went extinct 12,000 years or so ago). Native peoples started buying and breeding their own shorter stature ponies ideal for the region. But the massive overpopulation (and the reason that this is such an issue) came from the release of union cavalry. That would be why the current “wild” horses all resemble mustangs and not the sturdy, shorter stature ponies raised and used by the natives in these regions.

2

CaliBigWill t1_jdi6ng1 wrote

Scientists are questioning whether wild horses populations in the Americas went extinct and some Native Americans will tell you they didnt. Native Americans did not buy and breed.

https://www.yesmagazine.org/environment/2020/04/27/native-horses-indigenous-history

There was no mass release of horses at the end of the Civil War. Horses died by the millions in that war and at the end they needed to obtain more horses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Remount_Service

The US Cavalry still existed (and does exist) and still had to function (American Indian Wars)

The mustang is a free-roaming horse of the Western United States, descended from horses brought to the Americas by the Spanish.

1

furiousfran t1_jdis5ct wrote

>You are correct, but public opinion is so out of wack on this topic that it is hard to have a rational conversation.

We could feed people with all the millions of unwanted dogs and cats too but if you bring that up everyone thinks you're a monster 🤷

1

furiousfran t1_jdisk8i wrote

Feral cats don't either and they're probably worse for ecosystems but everyone shits themselves when you point out the only way to truly solve the problem is extermination, so instead we get these bullshit Trap neuter release programs that do fuckall for the birds and small animals that have to live with them.

Let's eat them instead, they taste like rabbit.

2

CaliBigWill t1_jdivxug wrote

Herds of wild free animals rounded up and decimated. The methods are questionable. Helicopters driving the herd into pens. Foals cant keep up, trampled,separated. Others panic and are injured. Once they're penned the rest is just as bad.

Cows are bred and raised to be food. They usually arent roaming free and suddenly they're food.

1

dangerbird2 t1_jdmbnj4 wrote

Przewalski's horse, a close relative of the domestic horses, is still around

Because horses originally evolved in North America, there has been the argument that the arrival of feral horses after 1492 was a reintroduction of a native species rather than an invasive feral population. This is why the US government is in the unique position of protecting a feral population

1

boomstickbutcher t1_jdq9akj wrote

Your use of quotation marks around the words cultural tradition says it all. It’s some dismissive and passive aggressive white guy thing to do that disregards others cultural practices. It’s like using finger quotes sarcastically to dismiss someone or something. It’s petty, and little. One thing you will learn about indigenous people if you ever spent the time, would be that indigenous cultures are highly adaptive, we wouldn’t survive if we weren’t. Unlike many of you European cultures that are static and unchanging for a thousand years.

0

ferrariguy1970 t1_jdrgsnv wrote

Does it make you feel better by polluting up a thread about “wild” horses with your unneeded language policing? Wild horses in the US are feral. We get it. You need to be a fucking douche about it. We get that too.

0

CaliBigWill t1_jdruxom wrote

Okay...and? Where are you going with this? Horses were on the North American continent and then went extinct.( this is debated).They were brought by the Spanish in the early 1500's. Probably before is debated as well. Either way what are you trying to say?

Now, new research out of the University of California Santa Cruz’s prestigious Paleogenomics Lab sheds new light on the argument by tying the DNA of the modern-day horse to its ancient ancestry on the North American continent.

https://americanwildhorsecampaign.org/media/scientific-research-alert-research-cements-native-ancestry-americas-wild-horses

https://awionline.org/content/wild-horses-native-north-american-wildlife

https://ictnews.org/news/yes-world-there-were-horses-in-native-culture-before-the-settlers-came

0

snow_michael t1_jdswnf3 wrote

If that's how it came across, dismissive of the peoples themselves, as opposed to calling something depending upon an animal introduced only 400 years ago not culturally traditional, then I am in the wrong for using those quotes, and I accept that I have offended those who saw it as dismissive of them. And I apologise for that

0