[deleted] t1_iui5j26 wrote
Reply to comment by lovdagame in TIL that the damage on the back of King Tut's skull was due to mishandling of his remains rather than a fatal blow to the head. by KelpCakeDanny
[deleted]
Kujen t1_iuicef8 wrote
They aren’t trying to cyber bully King Tut. That’s from real research. I saw it in a documentary too.
ninemarrow t1_iuj2cu3 wrote
Dude was genuinely offended for King Tut is this a time traveler?
sixstringronin t1_iujsv6j wrote
Now we know what the pyramids were for!
ninemarrow t1_iujww5q wrote
I learned this already from my PHd in Ancient Aliens from the history channel
Kaymish_ t1_iuk2ouu wrote
Pretty sure we already learned from Stargate that the Pyramids were landing zones fir alien starships.
lovdagame t1_iui7x6j wrote
Um ok rude dude
[deleted] t1_iui8ji3 wrote
[deleted]
zamfire t1_iuie7o7 wrote
What's mine say? Sweet!
ProfitInitial3041 t1_iuio010 wrote
A lot of edgy 12 year olds were pissed off by you lol
[deleted] t1_iuj1csd wrote
[deleted]
ProfitInitial3041 t1_iuj1wm6 wrote
I’m on the sinking boat with you now. I like to live dangerously.
[deleted] t1_iuj2b2v wrote
[deleted]
Containedmultitudes t1_iuj76n8 wrote
Sounds like you haven’t actually done any reading on the topic if you think that’s a troll comment, it was widely speculated that he had wide hips and breasts for years (athough it has since been proven false and just a stylistic choice in artistic depictions) and he definitely had a foot problem.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/100216-king-tut-malaria-bones-inbred-tutankhamun
AdNormal5424 t1_iuj9gzo wrote
thats...the conclusion genuinely educated people came to about king tut
[deleted] t1_iui9ozz wrote
[deleted]
Shenaniboozle t1_iujyuqy wrote
naw man, he may be of trollish ancestry, but this post is legit.
King tut, was roomy, big thru the hips.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments