Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

JaydedMermaid3D t1_ixbjvx8 wrote

I don't get it. He had already found 3 elements (co-found technically) what's the motivation for more?

7

Seamus_the_shameless t1_ixbluwv wrote

He possibly felt pressure to publish exciting results. Once you set the bar for yourself at discovering elements, there isn't much wiggle room.

14

4thofeleven t1_ixcpz5j wrote

There's some evidence that at least some of his work on those elements was also initially falsified - it seems like he was faking data to get the results he expected so he could claim the discovery ahead of any other team, and then conducting the experiments properly later.

It's just that the first few times, his hypothesis about the qualities of the new elements proved correct enough that his 'results' could be duplicated and so nobody looked closely at his work, while with the later elements, he was way off and nobody else could get results even close to what he was claiming.

2

Shiny_Deleter t1_ixbnubq wrote

Those physicists, always looking to make a quick buck.

6

[deleted] t1_ixbnknz wrote

[deleted]

1

charliespider t1_ixbrxts wrote

But it's also peer reviewed and if results are not reproducible then those results are ultimately discarded, especially when better science comes along.

4

[deleted] t1_ixbv50x wrote

[deleted]

0

BobsReddit_ t1_ixcl0bt wrote

Because you are asking if we should trust science. We can. Just have to go through the process correctly as this person said

1

MPCNPC t1_ixkuluu wrote

Do people get one downvote and delete their account??

1

ColtS117 t1_ixrp2iy wrote

At least he didn’t merge his daughter with a dog.

1