Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Fake_William_Shatner t1_j5hbr0g wrote

I don't think it's necessarily the case that the people in the boats would have been overloaded. A boat could move in close and get some people who could swim to them and move away. Other boats could do the same.

Probably within about a few minutes, most of the people wouldn't be able to move and at no time, could swim faster than the boats could be paddled. So really it was a matter of dragging half-aware people into a boat and throwing a blanket on them.

The upper class was a bit too risk averse and didn't feel an obligation to help is how I see it.

240

Laumser t1_j5hhshu wrote

There was pretty much no visibility though, I wouldn't have been confident making that call

136

e_007 t1_j5jfe4x wrote

Yea that’s one of the many terrifying things about that event, once the lights went out those people were in absolute pitch black..

35

bak3donh1gh t1_j5hk0jc wrote

Anyone with half a brain on those boats should be able to tell that freezing water makes people slow. No one is swarming a boat in the cold salt water.

All the people down voting me are fine with letting people drown.

−148

Laumser t1_j5hkui4 wrote

Of course people are swarming boats, it's a very real danger

111

vonvoltage t1_j5hpupj wrote

You've got about 5-10 minutes max in the north Atlantic until you're too numb to move.

Source: This is where I grew up and we were told this constantly by rescue workers coming to our schools and making announcements on the evening news etc...

There wasn't going to be any swarming going on.

27

eh-guy t1_j5j4fj7 wrote

The ocean is warmer on their side in the UK/Ireland so id imagine these people in the moment would not be thinking the water was too cold to get swamped, especially not after the adrenalin and shock they would be experiencing. Most people do not come from places like us where the ocean can literally be below freezing during winter.

4

bak3donh1gh t1_j5hlpn4 wrote

Have you ever been in cold water before? I mean freezing water. Have you been in it in 1912 clothes? If your boat was right there at the beginning, maybe yeah. This guy wanted to turn his boat around and go back. That's plenty of time for people to get into the later stages of hypothermia. And while yes hypothermia was not as well understood back then (unfortunately thanks to Nazis, it is now)people still knew cold=bad.

−14

Timbershoe t1_j5ip41a wrote

>Have you ever been in cold water before?

I have, yes.

>I mean freezing water.

Yes. In glacial flows on the coast of Greenland and Svalbard. Full immersion, multiple times.

>Have you been in it in 1912 clothes?

Fuck. No. I only had my underwear on. Guess that rules me out from commenting further on the physiological impacts of prolonged submersion in arctic water.

Dammit.

39

Gandzilla t1_j5ipic4 wrote

Imagine the embarrassment if you did it in 1920‘s clothes and you prepared for the wrong discussion.

33

bak3donh1gh t1_j5ituag wrote

Full immersion. So how long? 5 minutes, 10 minutes. How bout 30 minutes? How about 4 hours? I bet you pretty fast, you start moving slow, your fingers stop responding. You grow confused and tired. All the time having to tread water.

I think you get the idea, but hey, go ahead and leave people to die.

−24

Timbershoe t1_j5ius8k wrote

Full immersion means head below the water, so no I wasn’t doing that for 30min or 4 hours. You keep the back of your neck, and more importantly the vagus nerve within it, out of the water as it can trigger a parasympathetic response in your heart causing an aneurysm.

I was mildly making fun of your statements, as while I have swum, waded and washed in Arctic glacial water it was pretty clear you haven’t and put a ridiculous demand of period specific clothing as a qualifier.

I have no opinion on how long a person can last in the open ocean before death, it’s not something I have any experience of. And, probably more importantly, neither do you.

So I guess my point is perhaps don’t confidently state you know about a subject that you don’t have any experience in? Leave a little room for discussion.

16

Regular-Leave t1_j5o2ij1 wrote

The current basic offshore training (BOSIET) for helicopter sea transfers says you can die in as little as two minutes in wet clothes in the North sea. You're taught to not even try to swim or Dave yourself as you lose heat faster, you have to curl up and hope you're able to be rescued in time.

1

bak3donh1gh t1_j5iwigr wrote

We are talking about a specific hypothetical, and you want to open this hypothetical to any fucking goddamn time in the water. So yes if I was in the bahamas in the middle of summer and there were 100s of people in the water nearby I wouldn't immediately go in there with a boat. Key word being immediately.

If I was in a goddamn boat during the sinking of the Titanic and I could turn back and save people in the freezing fucking water, I would. It also sounds like you have had training in water, as well, I don't think anybody who was in the water had the fucking option of keeping their neck out of the water. I don't know what hypothetical situation of a boat full of trained water experts sinking in waist deep water equates to the sinking of the Titanic that your talking about. Sounds like people that don't need saving.

I can confidently state if you get shot in the head and the bullet goes through your brain, you will die. One can confidently state things if they understand the facts. I don't have to get shot in the head to know what happens if you do.

−15

Timbershoe t1_j5ixaf7 wrote

You’re very confident that you know better than someone who has direct experience of Arctic water immersion.

But you don’t have any experience or knowledge. Just opinion.

It’s not a specific hypothetical. The Titanic did sink. Pitman, and many others, gave first hand accounts of the situation.

And some lifeboats did return to pick up survivors. It’s one of the reasons Pitman deeply regretted not returning. The passengers that had life jackets, or floating debris, survived for quite a lot longer than your 5min timeline.

But you’re more fond of your opinions that any actual experiences.

10

bak3donh1gh t1_j5j2apz wrote

WHAT FUCKING 5 MINUTES TIMELINE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?! Im talking about being in a boat that left the area and then coming back THATS NOT 5 FUCKING MINUTES! These are untrained socialites in the goddamn 1920's

So you went in controlled conditions into some Arctic water, wow, so impressive. Still haven't given me an approximate number for how long. Have you ever had hypothermia? In the water? Then I'd take your first-hand account.

And you just fucking admitted it! It was possible for them to go back and pick people up, without being swarmed by near frozen passengers.

−4

Timbershoe t1_j5ja7w9 wrote

I really should stop responding, as you’re clearly angry I don’t agree you’re any sort of expert.

>WHAT FUCKING 5 MINUTES TIMELINE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!

The 5 min you keep stating repeatedly.

>These are untrained socialites in the goddamn 1920's

No, the 1st class passengers were prioritised to lifeboats. The 2nd and 3rd class passengers were left in the water.

And human physiology hasn’t changed over the past 100 years.

>So you went in controlled conditions into some Arctic water, wow, so impressive.

It wasn’t controlled conditions. And it’s not so much impressive as direct personal experience. In fact, glacial run off water is 2 degrees colder than the open Arctic Ocean.

The key takeaway is I have more experience than you. Yet you continue to argue you’re the expert.

>Still haven't given me an approximate number for how long.

Depends. Up to 15min, I suppose.

>Have you ever had hypothermia? In the water?

No, I am not a fool. I’m not giving myself hypothermia in water just to find out what it feels like to die.

>Then I'd take your first-hand account.

Stop gatekeeping. Stop acting like you’re the expert here. That’s all I’m saying.

>And you just fucking admitted it! It was possible for them to go back and pick people up, without being swarmed by near frozen passengers.

I specifically said I had no opinion. It’s you that’s claiming the expert knowledge.

Read the accounts of the sinking, if you read the descriptions from the lifeboats, if you had any knowledge or experience at all I wouldn’t be calling you out.

7

DaddyBee42 t1_j5j42li wrote

>I can confidently state if you get shot in the head and the bullet goes through your brain, you will die.

Looks like someone didn't see the JFK post from a couple of days ago.

'Gunshot wound to the head not a death sentence'

How confidently incorrect you are. Dunning-Kruger strikes again!

2

bak3donh1gh t1_j5mekqf wrote

I specified through the brain for a reason. Though, yes, you can get pierced through parts of your brain and still survive. I had thought that I had dumbed down the statement enough. Unless it's a small calibre bullet entering through your eye or other hole around your brain, any bullet able to pierce your skull, and go through your brain, is going to leave an even bigger exit hole or is going to ricochet off the inside of your skull and continue to do damage. So yes, Dunning-Kruger strikes again!

If bullet go through brainy and make brainy mush and fail out of head, you go to sleep and never wake up.

1

DaddyBee42 t1_j5nbijb wrote

I did not realise that 'dumbing a statement down' meant turning it from something that is factual and correct into something that is speculative and bullshit. Why would you say the wrong things, when the right ones were available? How does that help dumb people?

>If bullet go through brainy and make brainy mush and fail out of head, you go to sleep and never wake up.

That's it, now we're getting there. Good job!

1

bak3donh1gh t1_j5nf7t1 wrote

Wtf are you even talking about, nothing I have said is speculative? My previous statement was of course meant as hyperbole, but was also phrased in a way to make it as accurate as possible. Instead you seem to be unable to realize that and are concentrating on unlikely edge cases. Not to mention TBI can literally change who you are.

If people are in freezing water for an extended period of time the start to go into hypothermia. Symptoms of hypothermia include:

Weak pulse

Clumsiness or lack of coordination

Drowsiness or very low energy

Confusion or memory loss

Loss of consciousness

Now does this sound like a state of being in which persons could climb the side of a boat en mass and cause it to tip? Adrenaline only lasts for so long.

At NO point did I ever say in 5 minutes any or all boats should have gone back. The ONLY 5 minutes I have referred to is your time in 'glacial water'. In controlled conditions, with no panic or fear. As well as being in good medical condition, no malnutrition and no history of nicotine use. I'm sure with a warm tent or whatever nearby.

But I'm do e arguing with some Jackass who dipped his toes in cold water and think he's an expert on cold water survival.

1

DaddyBee42 t1_j5p489q wrote

Yep, you sure are! I'm not that guy, I'm a completely different person! You absolute dipshit.

1

bak3donh1gh t1_j61u94y wrote

Sorry for not reading the username after responding to a single person for a long ass thread, you dipshit! It is totally obvious too when you're going back and forth responding on the website and an app, you fuckwit.

1

Regular-Leave t1_j5iv16l wrote

You sound like a condescending prick

−17

Timbershoe t1_j5iv7ng wrote

Yeah. Probably.

However the other guy is arrogantly stating his opinion as fact.

I just didn’t recognise they had any subject matter expertise.

5

subzero112001 t1_j5i4aw8 wrote

Anyone with half a brain should be able to tell that desperate people who are dying can do pretty incredible things to survive.

36

unropednope t1_j5k1nfq wrote

You're down voted to hell because you don't know what adrenaline can do apparently.

3

bak3donh1gh t1_j5k7lie wrote

There is no amount of adrenaline in your body that can kepp you warm for 30 minutes in sub-zero water.

1

Ok-Papaya-3490 t1_j5izlqd wrote

Dozens of people drowning in ice water prob aren't logically pursuaded not to board the boat

88

Glahoth t1_j5jip3g wrote

I think they wouldn’t even be able to swim to the boat. It’s either you rescue them, or they die within a couple of minutes.

35

Unusual-Delivery-276 t1_j5m73bv wrote

Sir this boat has reached its capacity. Please continue freezing to death in the water at this time thank you

4

Ok-Papaya-3490 t1_j5melze wrote

Thank you for your cooperation and hope you will choose Titanic in your afterlife

3

AdNormal5424 t1_j5j2c1q wrote

The swarming part is realistic though, and then they all die. Adrenaline was pumping, people would be shoving eachother out of the way in freezing waters to clamber onto the boat. Then things just escalate from there

75

Binsky89 t1_j5k1yxw wrote

That's like rule 1 of saving a drowning person. If they're panicking then there's a great chance there will now be 2 drowning people.

21

Lexicon444 t1_j5kdyf4 wrote

Problem with that is they were in freezing water. Hypothermia sets in quickly and kills quickly. You’re usually unable to move as effectively in a few minutes. Not enough strength to capsize the boat.

5

SBRH33 t1_j5jizbz wrote

Take into consideration very panicked and traumatized individuals not thinking or behaving rationally. They could easily capsize a row boat in their panic state.

Almost like trying to save a panicked drowning person who almost drowns, and sometimes succeeds, the person trying to save them.

45

Piguarak t1_j5k4wz9 wrote

The main lifeboats on the Titanic were 30 feet long and had a capacity of 65 people each. That is far too big a boat for a single person to capsize. It would probably take at least a dozen people grabbing onto a single side to flip a boat like that. Many survivors reported that the screams of the people in the water only lasted a couple of minutes, and then there was silence as most were incapacitated by the freezing water.

I think that by the time the lifeboats rowed back to get survivors, most would either be dead or too weak to swamp the boat.

15

por_que_no t1_j5j7dub wrote

>I don't think it's necessarily the case

The question is whether you're willing to risk your life and all the others in the boat to find out.

27

SofieTerleska t1_j5mycmm wrote

Yes, this is the kind of situation where you only get one chance to find out, and if you screw it up, you're done for.

2

Anachr0nist t1_j5jy5mg wrote

This is very easy to theorize about when you're not freezing and disoriented, sitting in a boat at night and in terror for your life.

Maybe they could move, maybe they couldn't - they wouldn't know that on the boat. If people were able to move and a boat came by, every person that could reach out, would try to - it's that or die. And there was a good chance the boat could capsize in the chaos.

Ignoring all of that in favor of creating a narrative that fits your worldview is neither fair nor reasonable.

18

Fake_William_Shatner t1_j5k7w9u wrote

It's just what I might think to do in that situation. I will leave panic to other people who might be experts in that.

−6

Anachr0nist t1_j5kai6y wrote

If only you could have been there, rather than this jagoff Pitman, a mere officer on the ship who joined the Navy at 18, or the crew members on the boat. A pity!

6

Fake_William_Shatner t1_j5kgj79 wrote

Lighten up a little. And don't hate me just because I might be the solution to most problems.

None of them involving paperwork or using a map of course.

−5

WalkerBRiley t1_j5jjk8z wrote

> The upper class was a bit too risk averse and didn't feel an obligation to help is how I see it.

change that 'was' to 'is'. Things haven't changed in 100 years.

5

Regular-Leave t1_j5iuxti wrote

Within a few minutes all the people in the water would be dead

1