Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MatthewGeer t1_j86a17b wrote

That is such a Vermont headline.

−7

mrmcfakename t1_j86nf6d wrote

Well damn. We bought some from capital cannabis co and got sick not long after. Do we know what dates/strains?

18

CynicallyCyn t1_j86wsro wrote

I just bought some on Etsy. Search “exotic bird seed”. did it twice through two different vendors and both have sprouted so I haven’t gotten far enough long to analyze the quality of the buds it seems to be going great.

−2

ResponsibleExcuse727 t1_j86yac9 wrote

So how munch do they actually test? None of it? I know their thc count is way off but for pesticides? Seems like if the state wants this tax revenue they’re gonna have to invest in the testing or be held liable.

5

r0b0tdin0saur t1_j87h2oc wrote

Cultivators are supposed to have their harvest lots tested for pesticides before it reaches the market. The test results aren't "way off," however, representative sampling is ambiguous and you're going to see high variability in cannabinoid content from sample to sample within a lot.

7

Foxx983 t1_j87v7f6 wrote

Clones are also an option if you don't mind taking a trip to Maine.

2

BlippysHarlemShake t1_j88favr wrote

Damn, forgive me but this is awesome. Prior to legalization, you would have just gotten sick. Now we test. Sounds like a win to me

32

Vermonter_Here t1_j88ogva wrote

This is the sane take.

People reported getting sick from a particular batch of flower. So, the government agency responsible for regulating this product tested a sample and issued a consumer protection warning based on its findings.

This kind of response does not happen without a regulated consumer market.

25

Errl_Hebner t1_j894wj7 wrote

It's a win for sure, but in practice regulated testing is far from perfect and often easily gamed. For instance producers are often allowed to submit samples from the same crop repeatedly after failing pesticide and mold tests until they get the desired passing result. I still think the only reliable way to get clean weed is to know your grower or grow your own. I'm all in favor of regulated testing that actually keeps the consumer safe but we're not there yet. Here's a comic about it:

https://www.instagram.com/p/ChmnwwtuK62/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

3

VetMedicUSA t1_j89i2uh wrote

This is why the state should be working on taking over all of the testing statewide. Baffles me why they allowed the cultivators to pick and choose what gets tested (basically self regulate) which is quite possibly what this cultivator did.

2

VetMedicUSA t1_j89ieaa wrote

Yes it does, there was and is no mechanism in place for the state to know who was potentially affected by this. I find out about it this past Wednesday, February 8th and the first press releases went out on February 2nd.

1

catcatcat888 t1_j8a1rnd wrote

Find people that smoke locally. You can easily get clones. Tons of seeds around too. Lots of seed banks as well. Easy to grow and will be better than most stuff around. Don’t wet trim.

1

thisoneisnotasbad t1_j8bdun2 wrote

Gotcha.

The state doesn't have the resources to have all testing in house. This self reporting is a very common practice in all agricultural practices across the state.

It sucks some people got sick but imagine the costs of weed if that needed to offset state employees doing all the testing at a state run lab.

2

Vermonter_Here t1_j8nup4r wrote

Isn't this the case with most products, though? Currently, the only real way for companies to track which people purchased a recalled product is if they made the purchase with a customer loyalty card of some kind (containing contact info for the customer).

1