Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

FyuckerFjord OP t1_iudahlu wrote

Reply to comment by anthonylornemontague in Can't unsee (explained in comments) by FyuckerFjord

Never said he was.

−20

charliedontplaydat t1_iuddosr wrote

You made a post heavily directly implying he might have slipped in dog whistle images. If I was Malloy, I’d be figuring out how to sue you for Libel.

0

Inyabung t1_iudnu8h wrote

>If I was Malloy, I’d be figuring out how to sue you for Libel.

What a completely reasonable and not insane reaction to a meme

21

random_vermonter t1_iue6qam wrote

It would be more productive to sue the Malloy campaign for littering.

15

charliedontplaydat t1_iuet46d wrote

I agree. But the precedence is there. I only said so I’m an effort to let OP know.

0

FyuckerFjord OP t1_iudfxpq wrote

"Not saying it was intentional or even a Fruedian slip." ~ My exact words.

Pointing out something looks like something isn't libel.

11

charliedontplaydat t1_iudizof wrote

Okay, you do you.

Edit: free speech is free speech, but associating a person with a hate group is something else entirely. OP can make whatever memes they want, however shitty in quality they want, but the point remains they’re making a big accusation here.

I’m a socialist and a progressive and don’t support Malloy. I have a favorite Malloy “decoy” sign in fact. You guys can get butt hurt but libel is a slippery slope to edge upon the precipice of.

−6

YOurAreWr0ng t1_iudp21w wrote

You’re a real piece of work lol

6

charliedontplaydat t1_iudrsua wrote

Lmao why? I have always felt like people say this when they don’t have vocabulary to explain what they see is wrong. You’ll have to elaborate, if you can.

−3